In default proceedings, the Debts Recovery Tribunal dismissed the application due to the absent applicant and lack of representation after multiple adjournments.
Application dismissed as per default.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
DEBTS RECOVERY TRIBUNAL-I, CHANDIGARH
SA/201/2025 GURBAX KAUR Vs CAPITAL SMALL FINANCE BANK LIMITED
19.05.2026
Item No.10
Present: None for the Applicant. Mr. Vikas Sharma, Counsel for respondent bank (on VC).
This is third pass over since morning. Nobody is appearing on behalf of the applicant. It is already 02:00 p.m. It appears that applicant is not interested in pursuing this matter. Therefore, application filed by the applicant is dismissed in default .
File be consigned to record room after due compliance.
(A S Narang) Presiding Officer DRT-I, Chandigarh
MANOJ
Gurbax Kaur
Capital Small Finance Bank Limited
A S Narang
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
