No applicant appeared despite default notice in SA No. 200/2024 in Delhi Debt Recovery Tribunal. The proceedings were conducted via video/hybrid mode. The application was dismissed in default for non-prosecution.
Application dismissed in default for non-prosecution.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Debts Recovety Tribunal-Il, Delhi
SA/2OO 12024 SHMAS Vs INDIABULLS HOUSINGFINANCE LTD
29.05.2026
Item no.35
Present None for applicant Ms. Surbhi Singh, Counsel for respondentFI
Matter is taken through Video Conferencing/Hybrid Mode.
None appeared on the last date ofhearing on behalf of the applicant. Despite issuance of defaultnotice none appeared today. It appears that the applicantsare not interested in pursuing the case. Hence, thepresent SA is dismissedin default for non-prosecution.
File be consigned to records.
9.\ '
(susHIL KLrlt4AR RASTOGI) PRESIDING OFFICER DRT-II, Delhi
c
SHMAS
INDIABULLS HOUSING FINANCE LTD
Sushil K Kalekar Rastogi
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
