Tribunal dismissed an S.A. in default as the applicant did not appear despite a default notice, indicating lack of interest in pursuing the case.
Appeal dismissed in default.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Debts Recovety Tribunal-Il, Delhi
sA/199 12024 SHIV DAS VS INDIABULLS HOUSINGFINANCE LTD
29.05.2026
Item no.34
Present None for applicant Ms. Surbhi Singh, Counsel for respondentFI
Matter is taken through Video Conferencing/Hybrid Mode.
None appeared on the last date ofhearing on behalf of the applicant. Despite issuance ofdefault notice none appeared today. It appears that the applicantsare not interestedin pursuing the case. Hence, thepresent SA is dismissedin default for non-prosecution.
File be consigned to records.
9A (susHIL KUvrni RASToGI) PRESIDING OFFICER DRT-II, Delhi
c
Shiv Das
Indiabulls Housing Finance Ltd
Sushil Kumar Rastogi
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
