The Debt Recovery Tribunal dismissed the application for non-prosecution as the applicants were unrepresented and expressed no interest in pursuing the case. The matter stands disposed by a default order.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
DebtsRecoveryTribunal-Il'Delhi
sLlLeT l2o2s BHARATPUSTAK ;NIT'TONN VS SAMMAN CAPITAL LIMITED
Itemno.12
19.08.2026
Present:None for aPPlic?nt^ Ms' SurbhiSingh' Counsel for respondentFI
Matteris taken through video conferencing/ Hybrid Mode'
Noneappearedonbehalfoftheapplicantonl3.0t.2026and 11.06.2020.ftfone upp"u'"d today'It appearsthat the applicants arenotinterestedinpursuingtneCaSe.Hence,thepresent s/lLg7lz025i;Jismissedin default for non-prosecution'
File beconsigned to records'
C}i
(SUSHIL KUMARRASTOGI) _ PRESIDINGOFFICER DRT-II,Delhi
c
National Book Trust Vs Samman Capital Limited
Sushil Kumar Rastogi
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
