Disposed
Ms Topline Commodities Pvt. Ltd. v. Canara Bank
DRTSA/193/2024
What the court decided
AI extract
Outcome
Disposed
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
| Order Sheet | ||
|---|---|---|
| Case No. SA | 193 of 2024 M/S. TOPLINE COMMODITIES PVT LTD -VS- CANARA BANK |
|
| Date of the Order |
Order with Signature | Office action date and da Signature Parties wh necessar |
| 30.07.2026 (Sl. No. 19) |
Ms. Rakhi Mondal. … For the Sarfaesi Applicant. Ms. Anindita Das, Ms. Mayuree Chakraborty. … For the Respondent Bank. |
|
| It is submitted by learned counsel for applicant as well as defendant bank that property described in schedule is situated at Karol Bagh, New Delhi, has been sold by bank with consent of legal heirs of borrowers. Learned counsel for applicant borrower is also present today. She has no objection. She has filed IA 2312 of 2026 in SA 98 of 2024 and bank has filed IA 2223 of 2026 in SA 193 of 2024 which speaks that property in Karol Bagh, New Delhi, has been sold with consent of parties. Learned counsel for applicant prays for dismissal of SA 98 of 2024 as well as SA 193 of 2024. Both the SAs being SA 98 of 2024 and SA 193 of 2024 are disposed of as withdrawn by applicant. (AMBUJA MOHAN DAS) PRESIDING OFFICER |
2
Office action date and da Signature Parties wh necessar
Date of Order with Signature the Order ac
M/S. TOPLINE COMMODITIES PVT LTD
CANARA BANK
Ambuja Mohan Das
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court