The applicant sought revision under the SARFAESI Act. The parties amicably settled the dispute with a payment of Rs. 8 Lakhs, and the respondent issued a No Objection Certificate. The special application was dismissed as withdrawn.
Special Application dismissed as withdrawn.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
CONTD. ORDER. SHEET
PAGE NO
CASE NO
| DATE | DESCRIPTION OFTHEORDER | REMARK |
|---|---|---|
| S.No.-2 sA183/2 08t07l7 ) |
AppticantsbyVivekanandSahu,Advocate Respondent-Fl byShriViputSaraswat, Advocate TheLdCounselforRespondent-Fl hasplaceda copy ofMemodaled06107/26beforetheBenchandthe main copyfitedbeforetheregistryasDiaryNo'- 7101126.ltisstatedthatduringthependencyofthe instantSAtheAppticantshaveamicabtysettledthe disputewiththeRespondent-Flupon paymentofRs.8 Lakh underfuttandfinalsett[ementandthe Respondent-FlhadatsoissuedNoObjection Certificateinfavouroftheborrowerandco- borrower. The LdCounselfor theRespondent-Flhas furtherpraysfordismissalofpresentSAasbeing infructuous. TheLdCounsetfortheAppticantshasendorsedhisno objection onthefaceofcopyoftheMemoptaced beforetheBenchandfairtyconsentedthatthe matterhasbeen setttedbetweenthepartiesand praysfor withdrawal of thesame' ConsideringthesubmissionmadebytheMemofited bytheLdCounselfortheRespondent-FlandtheNo Objection endorsedbytheLdCounselforthe Appticanton thesamethatthematterhasbeen amicablesetttedbetweenthepartiesforanamount ofRs.8Lakhtowardsfutlandfinalsettlement,the present5Astands dismissedaswithdrawn.Recordbe consignedtotherecordroom. |
|
| (Pankaj KumarUpadhyay) Presidingofficer DRT-2Ahmedabad lncharge:DRTJabatPur $qfl*' |
Applicants
Respondent-Fl
Pankaj Kumar Upadhyay
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
