Theapplicant did not appear. The Debts Recovery Tribunal dismissed the appeal, observing that the auction was conducted, details provided, but no steps had been subsequently taken as per the record.
The Sa was dismissed and all pending IAs were disposed of.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court of the Presiding Officer Debts Recovery Tribunal, Jaipur
Item No. 34
Case No.SA/181/2025
RAJESH KUMAR SONI Vs SAMMAN CAPITAL LTD
Date: 15.07.2026.
Proceedings through hybrid mode:
Present:
None for the Applicant
Shri Pramod Kumar, Counsel for the Respondent
In this matter, none appears for the applicant. Counsel for the respondent FI submits that they have not challenged the sale. The property is already sold. Third party interest has been created. Nothing survives in this SA.
I have gone through the order sheet dated 09.03.2026 which records that the auction was conducted 31.05.2025 and details were provided to the applicant while filing reply on 26.08.2025, but nothing has been done, no steps have been taken.
With these observations, SA deserves to be dismissed and dismissed accordingly. All pending IAs if any stands disposed of.
File be consigned to record as per rules. Copy of order be uploaded on website.
(Vimal Gupta) Presiding Officer Debts Recovery Tribunal, Jaipur
cm
RAJESH KUMAR SONI
SAMMAN CAPITAL LTD
Vimal Gupta
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
