The Debts Recovery Tribunal dismissed an application because no counsel appeared for the applicant on the hearing date despite a prior absence and notice, leading the court to conclude the applicant had no interest in the matter.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
ORDER SHEET DEBTS RECOVERY TRIBUNAL, SILIGURI
IA Case No.340/2026 in SA/178/2024
Crast Global Agro Food & Beverage Pvt. Ltd. & Ors
Applicant
Vs
State Bank of India
Defendants
Office action with date and Date of Order with Signature dated Order signature of parties when necessary. Item No.31 Order No.25
25.08.2026
Present:
Counsel for the applicant : None.
Counsel for the respondent : Mr. Debanjan Chakraborty.
No one appears for the applicants and on previous date of hearing also the erstwhile Ld. Counsel had abstained to appear in this matter as she was not getting any instruction from the client. Although one opportunity was given to the applicant but even then the position is the same and as such it seems that the applicant has got no interest in the matter and accordingly, this case is dismissed .
Let the file be consigned to the Record Room.
Order be uploaded in the website of the Tribunal.
RAKESH Digitally signed by RAKESH PATI PATI TIWARI Date: 2026.08.28 TIWARI 00:04:02 +05'30'
(RAKESH PATI TIWARI) Presiding Officer DRT-Siliguri
Crast Global Agro Food & Beverage Pvt. Ltd. & Ors
State Bank of India
Rakesh Pati Tiwari
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
