Application dismissed in default for non-prosecution due to failure of applicant to appear despite notices, as the applicant was not interested in pursuing the case.
Application dismissed in default.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Debts Recovela Tribunal-Il, Delhi
sA/16412O2s MS ARSH CONSTRUCTIONS Vs UNION BANK OF INDIA
27.0r.2026
Item no. 38
Present: None for applicant. Shri Navin Kumar, counsel for respondent bank.
Matter is taken through Video Conferen cingl Hybrid Mode.
Despite issuance of default notice, no one appeared on behalf of the applicant. It appears that the applicant is not interested in pursuing the case. Hence, the present SA is dismissed in default for non-prosecution.
File be consigned to records.
E), (SUSHIL KUMAR RASTOGI) PRESIDING OFFICER DRT-II, Delhi
P
MS ARSH CONSTRUCTIONS
UNION BANK OF INDIA
SUSHIL KUMAR RASTOGI
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
