It is stated that no appearance was made by the applicant despite default notice. Deeming the applicant not interested, the Special Appeal is dismissed in default of non-prosecution.
Special Appeal dismissed in default for non-prosecution.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Debts Recovery Tribunal-Il, Delhi
sA/1s0l2o2s PRANAY SINHA Vs ICICI BANK LIMITED
L9.03.2026
Item no.22
Present None for applicant Mr. Rakesh Singh, Counsel for respondent bank
Matter is taken through video conferencing/Hybrid mode.
None appeared on behalf of the applicant on 19. Ll.zozs. Despite issuance of default notice none appeared today. It appears that the applicants are not interested in pursuing the case. Hence, the present SA is dismissed in default for non-prosecution.
File be consigned to records.
5-\
(SUSHIL KLfiAR RASTOGI) PRESIDING OFFICER DRT-II, Delhi
Pranay Sinha
ICICI Bank Limited
Sushil Kumar Rastogi
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
