Dismissed
Sushil Thakur v. Himachal Pradesh Gramin Bank
DRTSA/148/2024
What the court decided
AI extract
Outcome
Dismissed
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
DEBTS RECOVERY TRIBUNAL-I, CHANDIGARH
SA/148/2024 SUSHIL THAKUR Vs HIMACHAL PRADESH GRAMIN BANK
27.01.2026 Item No.26
Present: None for the Applicant. Mr. RK Bansal, Counsel for respondent bank.
This is third pass over since morning. Nobody is appearing on behalf of the applicant. It is already 02:00 p.m. It appears that applicant is not interested in pursuing this matter. Therefore, application filed by the applicant is dismissed in default .
File be consigned to record room after due compliance.
(A S Narang) Presiding Officer DRT-I, Chandigarh
PANKAJ
Sushil Thakur
Himachal Pradesh Gramin Bank
A S Narang
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court