Dhani Ram v. Punjab and Sind Bank
Case brief
What is this about?
In a third hearing, as the applicant failed to appear, the Debts Recovery Tribunal dismissed the application in default.
What the court decided
DEBTS RECOVERY TRIBUNAL-I, CHANDIGARH
SA/146/2026 DHANI RAM Vs PUNJAB AND SIND BANK
07.09.2026
Item No.31
Present: None for the Applicant. Mr. R.K. Jindal, counsel for respondent bank (on VC).
Counsel for the respondent bank states that the applicant has deposited Rs.6.00 lacs.
This is third pass over since morning. Nobody is appearing on behalf of the applicant. It is already 01:15 p.m. It appears that applicant is not interested in pursuing this matter. Therefore, application filed by the applicant is dismissed in default .
File be consigned to record room after due compliance.
(A S Narang) Presiding Officer DRT-I, Chandigarh
PANKAJ
Parties & counsel
- applicant
DHANI RAM
- respondent
PUNJAB AND SIND BANK
Coram
A S Narang
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court