This judgment merely states the order sheet maintains no representation by the parties since 21.04.2025 for Special Appeal No. 135 of 2025. The court held the applicant was not interested in pursuing the case. Consequently, S.A. No. 135 of 2025 was dismissed and disposed of with the file consigned to the Record Room.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
| 23.01.2026 | Exh. | Roznama-MDRT-II S.A. No.135 of 2025 |
Next date |
|---|---|---|---|
| s.u-31 | None for the parties. Order-sheet maintained by the learned Registrar dated 21.11.2025 shows that since 21.04.2025 no representation was made by the parties. Even today, no representation is made by the Applicant either personally or through the Advocate or through VC. It appears that the Applicant is not interested in pursuing this case any further. So, S.A. No.135 of 2025 stands dismissed and disposed of accordingly. File be consigned to the Record Room after due compliance. Sd/- P.O. DRT-II |
Closed |
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
