Ayesha Bibi v. Canara Bank
Case brief
What is this about?
The applicant appeared unrepresented, but earlier hearing participation was also absent. The Second Deputy RBHT dismissed the application due to lack of interest by the applicant, leaving it for Record Room.
What the court decided
ORDER SHEET DEBTS RECOVERY TRIBUNAL, SILIGURI
SA/133/2026
Applicant
Ayesha Bibi Applicant Vs Canara Bank Defendants
| Date of Order |
Order with Signature | Office action with date and dated signature of |
|---|---|---|
| parties when | ||
| necessary. | ||
| Item No.12 | Order No.04 |
12.08.2026
Present:
Counsel for the applicant : None.
Counsel for the respondent : Mr. S. Barman on behalf of Mr. P.K. Sikdar.
No one appears for the applicant. From perusal of the record it transpires that on previous date of hearing also no one had participated in the hearing for the applicant.
List this matter for second call.
Parties & counsel
- applicant
Ayesha Bibi
- respondent
Canara Bank
Coram
Rakesh Pati Tiwari
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court