Special Appeal No.124 of 2022 was dismissed and disposed of because the applicant failed to make any representation on court dates, deemed uninterested.
Special Appeal No.124 of 2022 is dismissed and disposed of.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
| 17.04.2026 | Exh. | Roznama-MDRT-II S.A. No.124 of 2022 |
Next date |
|---|---|---|---|
| None for the Applicant. Mr T.N. Tripathi, Advocate for the Defendant. |
|||
| rst – 17 | On previous two dates, no representation was made by the Applicant. Even today, no representation is made by the Applicant either personally or through the Advocate or through VC. It appears that the Applicant is not interested in pursuing this case any further. So, S.A. No.124 of 2022 stands dismissed and disposed of accordingly. Pending IAs, if any, stands disposed of. File be consigned to the Record Room after due compliance. Sd/- P.O. DRT-II |
Closed |
Applicant
Defendant
P.O.
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
