On 13.04.2026, the Debts Recovery Tribunal dismissed an application because the applicant failed to appear despite being listed for a second call, seemingly having lost interest in the matter.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
ORDER SHEET
DEBTS RECOVERY TRIBUNAL, SILIGURI
SA/120/2025
Sri Soumen Guha
Applicant
Vs
ICICI Bank Ltd.
Defendants
Date of Order
Item No.40 13.04.2026
Order with Signature
Order No.11
Office action with date and dated signature of parties when necessary
Present:
Counsel for the applicant : None.
Counsel for the respondent: Mr. Sagnik Bhowmick.
No one appears for the applicant.
List this matter for second call.
(RAKESHPATI TIWARI) Presiding Officer DRT-Siliguri
ORDER SHEET
DEBTS RECOVERY TRIBUNAL, SILIGURI
SA/120/2025
Sri Soumen Guha Applicant Vs ICICI Bank Ltd. Defendants
| Dateof Order |
OrderwithSignature | Officeaction withdateand dated signatureof partieswhen |
|---|---|---|
| necessary. | ||
| ItemNo.40 | OrderNo.12 |
13.04.2026
2nd Call:
Present:
Counsel for the applicant: None.
Counsel for the respondent: Mr. Sagnik Bhowmick.
No one appears for the applicant in the second call as well and it seems that the applicant has lost his interest in prosecution of this matter and accordingly, the case is dismissed.
Let the file be consigned to the Record Room.
(RAKESHPATI TIWARI) Presiding Officer DRT-Siliguri
Sri Soumen Guha
ICICI Bank Ltd.
Rakeshpati Tiwari
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
