the said notice was received by the Applicant and the same was also published in two daily newspapers. Thereafter, the Respondent issued possession notice dt. 14.0s.2023 in respect of the mortgaged properties and the said notice was sent to the Applicant and others and published in two daily newspapers and arso affixed on the schedule properties. Thereafter, the bank issued Redemption notice dt. 15.04.2023 and sent the said notice to the Applicant and thereafter, the bank obtained valuation reports dt.25.O1.2O24 and 29.03.2024 from the approved valuer. subsequently, the Bank issued sale Notice dt.2g.03.2024 for conducting auction of the schedure properties and the said notice was published in two daily newspapers and also affixed on the schedule properties. challenging the said notice, the Applicant fired the present sA and this Hon'ble Tribunal granted interim stay. Thereafter, the bank issued fresh Sale Notice dt-26.o7.2024 for conducting auction on 2g.o8.2o24 and the said notice was sent to the Appricant through Regd. post and the same was published in two leading newspapers an arso affixed on the schedule properties. Thus, the Respondent Bank has duly followed the procedure prescribed under the provisions of SARFAESI Act,2oo2 and Rules made thereunder in issuing the impugned sale notices for conducting auction of the schedule properties. Accordingry, Ld. counsel prayed to dismiss the SA.