Disposed

Rajashri Pramod Ghorpade v. Kogta Financial (India) Ltd.

DRT25 Apr 2026SA/114/2025

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The Special and National Lok Adalat allowed the withdrawal of a Securitization Application filed by a borrower against a financial institution. The applicant settled dues and obtained a No Objection Certificate, leading to the closure of the account and the disposal of the matter as settled.

What did the court decide?

Withdrawal of Securitization Application SA No. 114/2025 and disposal of the matter as settled with refund of court fees.

Rajashri Pramod Ghorpade versus Kogta Financial (India) Ltd. — Consumer Protection | DRT (2026)

¶1

BEFORE THE SPECIAL AND NATIONAL LOK ADALAT ORGANISED ON 25 APRIL.2026 BY THE DEBTS RECOVERY TRIBUNAL. AURANGABAD AND DSTRCIT LEGAL SERVICES AUTHORIY

¶2

SA No. ll4/2025 (Sr.no. 177)

¶3

SA WITHDRAWAL

¶4

Applicant(s): Rajashri Pramod Ghorpade (hereinafter referred to as / borrower / guarantors )

¶5

VERSUS

¶6

Defcndant(s) : Ko gta Financial (l nrlia) Ltd (hereinafter referred to as bank / financial institution)

¶7

Details of disrrute / claim: The claim of the bank is to the tune of Rs.1532162 /- with cost and interest.

¶8

The applicant borrower has paid the dues in his / their loan account and respondent bank has issued no objection certificate as per pursis filed. Therefore, the respondent bank does not want to proceed further. Hence present Securitization Application may be withdrawn as per the Consent Terms/pursis filed which is marked as 'A'.

¶9

Applicant(s)

¶10

Defendant( s)

¶11

Advocate for the Applicant(s) /Authorised Representative

¶12

ADV.. Hut(UL,v,-l^JO Advocate for the Defendant(s) /Authori sed Representative

¶13

,zA4124

¶14

Adv. Sanjay Nandure Menrber

¶15

Special and National Lok Adalat

¶16

¶17

Shri. Makarand Adw.ant Chairman Special and National Lok Adalat

¶18

Datc : 25,04.2026 Place : Aurangabad.

¶19

ORDE R

¶20

In view of the above pursis which are filed online/offline in the present matrer, the order is passed. The SA No. l l412025 stands disposed ofaccordin glv.

¶21

Date : 25.04.2026

¶22

4 ( Maka Adwant ) CHAI RMAN Special and National Lok Adalat

¶23

(RS)

¶24

l+'t-

¶25

BEFORE THE SPECIALAND NATIONAL LOK ADAI-AT ORGANISED ON 2qthAPRIL. zo26 BY THI] DEBTS RECOVERY TRIBUNAL AURANGABAD

¶26

SA No. rralzozs

¶27

Arrplicant(s) : RA-IASHRT PRAMOD GHORPADE

¶28

VERSUS

¶29

Defendant(s) : KocTA FINANCIAL (INr)r.) r.1'r).

¶30

V,'ITHDRAWAL PURSIS

¶31

The applicant/s has paid the dues in their loan account and has settled their loan account. The Respondent Financial Institution has issued a No Objection Certificate^(NOC) to the Applicant and the loan account stands closed. In view of the above settlement, nothing survives in the present Securitisation Application for adjudication. Hence this Hon'ble Tribunal may be pleased to dispose of the present Securitisation Application as settled.

¶32

Since the matter is before the Special and National Lok-Adalat, the Court Fees may please be refunded to the applicant as per rules.

¶33

Applicant(s)

¶34

sd/-

¶35

Advocate for the Applicant(s) /Authorised Representative

¶36

Def'endant(s) U sd/Advocate for the Defendant( S /Authorised^{Representative}

¶37

Date : 25-4-2026 Place : Aurangabad.

¶38

FINANCI
ElKogta

¶39

NO OBJECTION CERTIFICATE

¶40

DatB:26rc2/2026

¶41

To,

¶42

Mrs RA.,ASHRI PRAMOO GI'IORPADE

¶43

Addrgss:lvlORWADtfAKLlvlNA

¶44

TAL RAHURI RA}ITJRIAHMED tiAGA i,TAMRASHTM 4,I3716

¶45

Subilct Loan Accorrt tlo.Oooot 36214 in tlo name of Mrs^R \lASHRl^{PRAMOD GHORPADE}

¶46

O6ar Cr6,brIBr,

¶47

WB tEr€ by corim dosu€ of )ou Loan Accout No.0000136214^{Ths Agr€€rnonlof Loan snt€rsdirto} between tE lBs b€€n tffrirEH. ItE s6clrity crsatsd^by )ou^{for rnorlgageot lhg}

¶48

Propedy [1] Sitlabd ar i- G. NO.92nl1 GHORPADE^{WASTI,NEARZ P} SCHOm MORWAOI TAL RAHURI Rahti AHiTAD MGAR I4A]IARASHTRA 4137¹⁶

¶49

has boen rBleasod. We arB ,€trdt!^{allttE origlnaldocum€nb.Kindly,Erifyardack]D\ryledge} tp^Isceipt ot a[^{prop€rtypap€6-}

¶50

Pleass rDts itlat arry u$a,ad tir6 choqEs on )otr conuact,^{will bo dosto)€d} at ou ond. \6u nEy, if l,ou wish, issl.3 a 6top+aynonl lrEUr^E on to lou ba9.8

¶51

Phass trd E rclr8sd lErowith

¶52

orlgirlal^{poperty papers} of thB abo,E 8ald^propsrty.

¶53

ws vahs )olr rgbtorBlip wlth Kogb Fharclal (hdla) Llmitod.

¶54

Thar*irE yru

¶55

tt -ia c RaJastEn '^ld^rfl

¶56

For Kog6 Umllad

¶57

Authofied

¶58

Kogtra Flnarxial (hdi8) Limitsd,

¶59

CN: U67'l 20R.J1 996PLC0'l'l 406

¶60

REgislerpd ofroo: Kogla l-lorr$, Azad Mohsla, Bijsinagar - 305624, Rajasthan, Hta Corporate ofica: S-1, Cropalbad. l,lear Ajmer Pdia, Opp. Msto Pillar No. 143, Jatpu-302001, RaJastEn T6l. : 0141€767067 lEmall U :[email protected] l.!€bsita :w/rw.kogb.in

Rajashri Pramod Ghorpade v. Kogta Financial (India) Ltd.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Rajashri Pramod Ghorpade v. Kogta Financial (India) Ltd.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Kotak Mahindra Bank Limited versus Gurjit Kaur

Kotak Mahindra Bank Limited versus Baldev Singh

Punjab National Bank versus Sh. Baltej Singh

Bank of India versus Pradeep Sharma

Hdfc Bank Ltd. versus Harjeet Singh Gill

Icici Bank Limited versus Ganesh Petroleum , through Its Proprietor, Yogesh Ganesh Butale