Dismissed
Deepak Rajak v. Indian Bank
DRTSA/1081/2024
Case brief
AI extract
What is this about?
Disposal of a written application where applicants requested withdrawal due to amicable settlement between parties under Securityization Act.
What did the court decide?
The present application is dismissed as withdrawn. Record be consigned to record room.
What the court decided
AI extract
¶1
CONTD. ORDER. SHEET
¶2
PAGE NO.
¶3
CASE NO.
¶4
| DATE | DESCRIPTION OF THE ORDER | REMARK |
|---|---|---|
| sA1081t24 27t03t26 |
AppticantsbyShriAmit Khatri,Advocate Respondent-Bank byShriA.B.Sahu,Advocate The LdCounselforAppticanthasfitedanurgency applicationforwithdrawatofSAsupportedwiththe affidavitofShriDeepakRajakAppticantNo.-1.ltis statedthattheAppticanthavefitedthepresentSA assaitingtheactioninitiatedbytheRespondent-Bank undertheprovisionsofSecuritizationAct. ltis furtherstatedthat thedisputes betweenthe Appticant andtheRespondent-Bankhavenowbeen amicabtysetttedandtheAppticantdoesnotwish to pursuethepresent appticationanyfurther.The AppticantBank hasfurtherpraysforwithdrawalof presentSA. ConsideringthesubmissionmadebytheCounselfor AppticantandtheaffidavitoftheAppticantNo.'1 that thematterhasbeenamicabtesetttedbetween theparties,thepresent SAstandsdismissedas withdrawn.Record be consignedto therecordroom. Nv' \4,!1, (PravasKumarSingh) Presidingofficer DRTLucknow lncharge:DRTJabatpur |
Parties & counsel
AI extract
- applicant
Appltcants
- respondent
Respondent-Bank
Coram
AI extract
Pravas Kumar Singh
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court