Dismissed
Tahasin Bano v. Gic Housing Finance Ltd.
DRTSA/1039/2023
Case brief
AI extract
What is this about?
Application dismissed for default due to non-appearance of the applicant.
What the court decided
AI extract
¶1
DEBTS RECOVERY TRIBUNAL LUCKNOW
¶2
| Date oforderor proceeding |
Order withsignatureof court | Officeaction taken with date |
|---|---|---|
| S.A.No.1039/2023 13.01.2026 SL.No.35 |
Noneappearsfortheapplicant. BH of Ld. Counsel for the respondent- F.I.ispresent. I find that theapplicantis nottaking steps sincelong. Accordingly, the present Securitization Applicationis dismissedfordefault. Let the file be consigned torecord room. Order be uploaded on the Tribunal’s website. (Dictated) (Pravas Kuma_.,fngh) PresidingOfficer |
|
| (Mugish) |
Parties & counsel
AI extract
- applicant
Applicant
- respondent
Respondent
Coram
AI extract
Pravas Kumar
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court