The applicant bank founded its application on a compromise by the parties. The Debts Recovery Tribunal dismissed the Order Application as withdrawn.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
DEBTS RECOVERY TRIBUNAL-I, CHANDIGARH
OA/979/2022 STATE BANK OF INDIA Vs
GURDAS RAM @ GURDAS CHAND @ GURDAS SINGH (SINCE DECEASED)
12.01.2026
Item No.90
Present: Mr. Gurinderjit Singh, Counsel for the Applicant. None for defendants.
Counsel for the applicant bank has filed the affidavit of Shri Ankush Kher, Chief Manager and has made a statement at the Bar that the parties have compromised the matter and he does not want to pursue the present OA. Accordingly, the OA filed by the applicant bank is dismissed as withdrawn .
File be consigned to record room after due compliance.
(A S Narang) Presiding Officer DRT-I, Chandigarh
PANKAJ
State Bank of India
Gurdas Ram
A S Narang
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
