Canara Bank v. Smt. Amar Kaur
Case brief
What is this about?
DRT allowed the bank's application for recovery of decree amount and interest, holding that the loan dispute was conclusively proved via documentary evidence despite the respondents' absence.
What did the court decide?
Recovery of Rs.48,29,827.57 with interest at 13.05% p.a. from 20.01.2023, along with costs.
What the court decided
IN THE DEBTS RECOVERY TRIBUNAL-I, CHANDIGARH
BEFORE: A S NARANG, PRESIDING OFFICER
OA No: 972 of 2023 Date of Institution: 20.01.2023 Date of Decision: 29.08.2026
Date of Institution: 20.01.2023
Canara Bank having its branches all over India and a branch at Nakodar District Jalandhar, Punjab.
……..Applicant
Vs.
- Smt. Amar Kaur w/o Sarwan Singh r/o Mohalla Ranjit Nagar, Nakodar, Tehsil Nakodar, District Jalandhar, Punjab.
- a. Sh. Tarsem Singh s/o Late Sh. Sarwan Singh r/o Mohalla Ranjit Nagar, Nakodar, Tehsil Nakodar, District Jalandhar, Punjab.
- b. Sh. Tarlochan Singh s/o Late Sh. Sarwan Singh r/o Mohalla Ranjit Nagar, Nakodar, Tehsil Nakodar, District Jalandhar, Punjab.
- c. Sh. Parminder Singh s/o Late Sh. Kulwant Singh t/o Mohalla Ranjit Nagar, Nakodar, Theisl Nakodar, District Jalandhar, Punjab
Issues for consideration
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the applicant has proved the existence of a debt due to it under Section 19 of the RDB Act.
Parties & counsel
- applicant
Canara Bank
- respondent
Smt. Amar Kaur and others
Coram
A S Narang
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court