This order dismisses an application for withdrawal of the occasion as withdrawn after the respondent deposited the compromise amount of Rs. 8 Lakh, settling the loan account.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
CONTD. ORDER. SHEET
PAGE NO.
| DATE | DESCRIPTION OF THE ORDER |
|---|---|
| oA947125 27t03126 |
AppticantbyShriA.B.Sahu,Advocate Nonefor theDefendants |
| TheAppticant-BankhasfitedanAppticationfor withdrawalon16103126supportedbyaffidavit ofShri Sanjay Kumar Pandey,Chief Manager.ltisstatedthat thecompromise has beeneffectuatedbetweenthe Appticant andtheDefendantsandtheloanaccounts have beensettted bydepositofRs.8 Lakhbythe Defendantsand no amountremainsoutstandingtobe paidbytheDefendants. TheAppticant Bankhas furtherpraysfor withdrawalofpresentOA. |
|
| ConsideringthesubmissionmadebytheCounselfor Appticantandthe affidavitof theOfficerof theBank thattheDefendantshavedepositedtheentire compromiseamountofRs.8 Lakhtowardsfutland final.setttementofthedues,,thepresentOAstands dismissed aswithdrawn.Recordbeconsignedtothe recordroom. Q\Dv (PravasKumdrSingh) Presidingofficer DRTLucknow lncharge:DRTJabatPur |
| REMARK |
|---|
";.':i'". ,ri;lA;lhlr'.i{'::, ''.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
PravasKumdrSingh
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
