Dismissed
State Bank of India v. Dharmendra
DRTOA/932/2024
What the court decided
AI extract
Outcome
Dismissed
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
¶1
GONTD. ORDER. SHEET
¶2
PAGE NO.
¶3
| DATE | DESCRIPTION OF THE ORDER | REMARK |
|---|---|---|
| oA932124 27t03t26 |
AppticantbyShri L.P. Yadav, Advocate Nonefor theDefendants TheAppticant-Bankhasfited anApptication-for withdrawalon1gl02126 supportedbyaffidavit ofshri AjeetKumar, ChiefManager.ltisstatedthatthe parties duringthependencyofthe0AtheDefendants depositedaggregateamountofRs.7,40,001/- intheir loanaccountsand duetosuchdeposittheloan accountsoftheDefendants hasnow beenupgraded w.e.f.OZI02/26.TheAppticantBank hasfurther praysfor withdrawalofpresentOA' Consideringthesubmissionmade bytheCounselfor nppiiiuntindthe affidavit of theofficerof theBank tnittheDefendantshaveupgradedtheir -toan aciountsbydepositingRs.7,40,001/-andtheBank wishtowithdrawth;OA,thepresent0Astands JismisseOaswithdrawn.Recordbeconsignedtothe recordroom. q^)$ (PravasKumarSingh) Presidingofficer DRTLucknow lncharge:DRTJabatPur |
¶4
.i:,.. it...
Parties & counsel
AI extract
- applicant
Applicant-Bank
- respondent
Defendants
Coram
AI extract
Pravas Kumar Singh
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court