Remanded

State Bank of India v. Sanjeri Stone Depo

DRT25 Apr 2026OA/923/2024

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

A Special and National Lok Adalat disposed of a withdrawal application filed by a bank against a debtor. The matter was settled via a compromise proposal where the debtor paid a significant portion of the dues and closed the loan account.

What did the court decide?

Allowance of the withdrawal of the Original Application No. 923 of 2024 and refund of court fees; return of original documents.

State Bank of India versus Sanjeri Stone Depo — Banking and Recovery | DRT (2026)

¶1

BEFORE THE SPECIALANDNATIONALLOK ADALAT ORGANISED ON 25APR]L.2026 BY THE DEBTS RECOVERY TRIBUNAL. AURANGABAD AND DISTRICT LEGAL SERVICES AUTHORITY

¶2

OA No. 92312024 (Sr.no.l45 )

¶3

OA Withdrawal

¶4

Annlicant(s) l State Bank Of India (hereinafter referred to as bank / financial institution)

¶5

VERSUS

¶6

Defendant(s) : Sanjeri Stone Depo

¶7

(hereinaller refer:red to as / borower / guarantor(s))

¶8

Details of disrrute / claim : The claim of the bank is to the tune of Il.s. 373,1617.00/- with cost and interest.

¶9

The defendant/s has paid the dues in his / their loan account an amount of Rs. 27'00'000 /- (Rupees Twenty Seven Lakh only) as settlement amount under orS. Therefore, the applicant bank does not want to proceed further. Hence present original Application may be withdrawn as per the Consent Terms/Pursis filed by the applicant bank which is marked as^,A'.

¶10

The request for return of original documents as per rules is permitted. Since the matter is before the Special and National Lok-Adalat, the courl Fees be refunded to the applicant bank as per rules,

¶11

in view of the above consent Terms filed on record /uploaded onrine. The defendant is Present/absent todav.

¶12

Applicant(s)

¶13

Defenda n t(s)

¶14

Advocate fo r the /Authorised Repre

¶15

Advocate for the Defendant(s) /Authorised Represen tative

¶16

zsltllz6==-+'

¶17

Adv. Sanjay Nandure Member

¶18

Special and National Lok Adalat

¶19

Shri. Makarand Adwant Chairman Special and National Lok Adalat

Date : 25.04.2026

Place : Aurangabad.

ORDER/AWARD

In view of the above consent terms which are filed online/offline in the present matter, the order is passed. The oA No 92312024 stands disposed of accordingly.

¶24

Refund of Court Fees is ailowed as per rules. originar documents be returned as per DRT procedure Rules.

¶25

Date : 25.04.2026

¶26

(Shri. Ma ran d Adwant) CHAIRMAN Special and National Lok Adalat

¶27

¶28

al-4

¶29

IN THE DEBTS RECOVERY TRIBUNAL AT AURANGABAD.

¶30

ORIGINAL APPLICATION NO. 923 OF 2024

STATE BANK OF INDIA

....APPLICANT

VERSUS

M/S SANJERI STONE DEPOT

¶35

RESPONDENT

¶36

PURSHISH

¶37

That the applicant bank submits that the^{abovesaid OA was settled} accordingly IAno.954/2026 dt.7l4l2026^{was also filed.}

¶38

That the bank had also given a letter^{address to the undersignedto} withdraw the present OA. Hence above^{saidOA may kindly be kept in} National Lok Ada-lat d1.25 /⁴ / 2026.

¶39

Further the original documents may kindly^{be returned to the} applicant bank and matter is settled in^{lokadalat full court fees may} kindly be refunded to the applicant^bank.

¶40

Hence this purshish

¶41

Date:-L{/0412026 Submit dBv

¶42

,rl'-'"-' S S. Katariya Advocate.

¶43

APPLICANT

¶44

riqdlrn 1295! S k of I s!i Through 1 's Manage?/CCO Mr. Nanasaheb B. Kolpe

¶45

BEFORE THE SPECIAL AND NATIONAL LOK ADALAT ORGANISED ON 25'h APRIL 2026 BY THE DEBTS RECOVERY TRIBUNAL. AURANGABAD

¶46

OA No 923 ot2024

¶47

WITHDRAWAL PURSIS

¶48

Applica nt(s): State Bank of Inclia

¶49

VERSUS

¶50

Defendant(s) : M/s Sanjeri Stone Depot ( hereinafter referred to as / borrower / guarantor(s) )

¶51

Details of dispute / claim: The claim of the bank is to the tune of ps.4. r2.l t. 6, li-lrwith cost and interest.

¶52

The defendant/s has paid the dues in his / their loan account an amount of ns. .?/:t).Qh(hr *4 )fr/t{:t.,onlyl as settlement amount under oTS. Therefore, the applicant bank does not want to proceed further. Hence present Original Application may be withdrawn as per the present withdrawal pursis filed by the bank

¶53

The request for retum of original documents as per rules may be permitted. since the matter is before the Special and National Lok-Adalat, the court Fees may please be refunded to the applicant bank as per rules.

¶54

Applic (s)
ff-*{n
. 1295!
State of In
Through it s Manager/CCO
Mr. N aheb B. Kolpe

¶55

Defendant(s)

¶56

sd/-

¶57

Advocate for the Defendant(s) /Authorised Representative

¶58

Adv. ln S. Katariya For Applicant Bank

¶59

Date : 25-4-2026

¶60

IN THE DEBTS RECOVERY TRIBUNAL^{AT AURANGABAD.}

¶61

ORIGINAL APPLICATION NO. 923^{OF 2024}

STATE BANK OF INDIA

....APPLICANT

VERSUS

M/S SANJERI STONE DEPOT

¶66

RESPONDENT

¶67

I,A. FOR WITHDRAWAL^{OF OA}

¶68

I'J"IE APPLICANT MOST RESPECTFULLY^{SUBMITS AS UNDER:}

¶69

That the applicant bank^{had hled} the^{Original Applicationagainst} the defendant for recovery of^{moneywhich is pending for adjudication} before this hon'ble tribunal.

¶70

2.^'lhat after frlling of the present^OA against^{the defendant he had} approached to the applicant bank and^{paid dues as per compromise} proposal and closed his loan account. The^{letter to that effectalso} issued to the undersigned advocate by^{the bank which is enclosed} herewith. Hence now the^preset applicant bank^{do not want to proceed} with the present OA.

¶71

That hence this IA is filed for^{withdrawalof OA No. 923/2024} and further for refund of court^{fees as per rules in favour of applicant} bank be allowed.

¶72

An affidavit in support^{of I.A is filed with it.}

¶73

7 I

¶74

4, HENCETHEREFOREPRAYEDTHAT:

¶75

A. The application be allowed;

¶76

B. The defendant had closed his loan account as per compromise proposal hence Applicant bank want to withdraw the present oA. No-923/2024 and further requested to refund the court fees in favour ofbank as per Rules and oblige.

¶77

c' Any other suitabre rerief which this hon,ble court deems fit mav kindly be passed in favour of the applicant bank.

¶78

Date:- /oq2026 Submitte By

¶79

Sac S. Katariya Advocate

¶80

APPLICANT B State Through it's Manager/C CO Mr. Nanasaheb B. Kolpe

¶81

VERIFICATION

¶82

I Mr. Nanasaheb Bhimaji Ko1pe, Age 46 yrs, Occ.:_ Manager/CCO State Bank Of India, SARB, Aurangabad a body corporate constituted under the State bank of India Act 1955 having it,s Central office at Madam Cama Road Mumbai-4OOO21 and interalia Branch office at SARB Aurangabad and declare on solemn affirmation that the contents of this IA are true and correct to the best of my personal knowiedge and record made available.. Hence verified at Aurangabad on this^ti' htueh 2026. 4ror

¶83

Identifie By:-

¶84

/L,-^ Ad cate

¶85

Deponent Mr. Nanasah pc

¶86

IN THE DEBTS RECOVERY TRIBUNAL AT AURANGABAD.

¶87

ORIGINAL APPLICATION NO. 923 OF 2024

STATE BANK OF INDIA

....APPLICANT

VERSUS

M/S SANJERI STONE DEPOT

¶92

RESPONDENT

¶93

AN AFFIDAVIT IN SUPPORT OF IA^{FOR WITHDRAWAL}

¶94

I Mr. Nanasaheb Bhimaji Ko1pe, Age 46 Yrs, Occ.:-^Manager/CCO State Bank Of india, SARB, Aurangabad a body corporate^constituted under the State bank of India Act, 1955 having it's Central^{oflice at} Madam Cama Road, Mumbai-40002i and interalia Branch^{office at} SARB, Aurangabad and declare on aflirmation^{as under}

¶95

l. I say that the applicant bank had filed the^{Original Application} against the defendant for recovery of money which is^{pending for} adjudication before this honble tribunal.

¶96

I say that after filling of the^present OA^{againstthe defendanthe} had approached to the appiicant bank and^{paid dues as per} compromise proposal and closed his loan account'^{The Ietter to that} effect also issued to the undersign'ed^{advocateby the bank whichis} enclosed herewith. Hence now the^{preset applicant bank do not want} to proceed with the present OA.

¶97

I say that hence this IA is filed^{for withdrawal ofOA} No.92312024 and further for refund^of court^{fees as per rules in favour} of applicant bank be allowed.

¶98

HENCE THIS AFFIDAVIT

¶99

Date:- /Oq/2026 Submitte By

¶100

Sach . Katariya dvocate.

¶101

APPLICANT BANK State B k ol India Through it's Manager/^CCO Mr. Nanasaheb B. KolPe

¶102

VERIFICATION

¶103

I Mr. Nanasaheb Bhimaji Kolpe, Age 46 Yrs, Occ.:- Manager/CCO State Bank Of India, SARB, Aurangabad a body corporate constituted under the State bank of India Act 19.55 having it's Central office at Madam Cama Road Mumbai-40002 1 and interalia Branch office at SARB, Aurangabad and declare on solemn affirmation that the contents of this affida t in support of IA are true and correct to the best of my personal knowledge and record made available.. Hence verified at Aurangab ad on this th ldarch 2026 4Pril

¶104

Identifi By:-

¶105

Dep nent
,.'-f./
Mr. N eb B. Kolpe

A cate

,
<br>+
z

ad
/5
* A
t-
o

A Ue dla..., tJc ltp.teh ' j;11s gp 6sth Ih:t the cr. l.-..;" ql Documer:, arg tne end cotrec{ to ttE besl 0f my knowl et$ghliei Hence Verified 1fr.*rt.rr;.,,,. ailhtz{?/ at Aurangebad. Adf AN,ruffioil4ht $ff#ff:;:flll,l:,r:s

¶110

g:
t Ll.
N

¶111

,:lrir,,SBI The banker to every r.tlt;,-;

¶112

q{dizrseefr lnr$q *ted6 STAIE BANK OF INOIA

¶113

The Advocate Mr. Sachin Katariya Chhatrapati Sambhajinagar.

¶114

sARB/CSN/2025-26t011

¶115

Datet 02.04.2026

¶116

STATE BANK OF INDIA V/S

¶117

M/S SANJERISTONE DEPOT

¶118

TH L FD lT2 24

¶119

With reference to above, the loan account of M/s Sanjeri stone Depot proprietor Mohamedd Gous Allan, has settled uncler compromise and account closed on 02.04.2026

¶120

we request you to make an apprication at DRT /civir court for withdrawal of suit and original loan documents (wherever is applicable).

¶121

Please also make application at DRT/Civil Court for refund of Court fee.

¶122

Yours faithfully,

¶123

1 Assistant I

¶124

qe*.-r,esn*,8-s+],{Dlrflr.t' rrari:r {c-S {rrfl r+r+rm slR {gd fi-cr Stressed Assets Recovery Branch B⁺⁹⁷ 24A 24AO7g4 urqd riqfrx -l: r oo: Ffd =i.-1, egr+f,{, M, Plot No. 1, Town Centre, CTDCO A sbi-129536sbi.co.in T6rirf (qfiH) {dlItq @rd dqr{.I{ (ffd) -al1oo3 Mah3ralhtra Chhat apati Sambhajinagar (tndia) - 431OO3

State Bank of India v. Sanjeri Stone Depo

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

State Bank of India v. Sanjeri Stone Depo

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Kotak Mahindra Bank Limited versus Gurjit Kaur

Kotak Mahindra Bank Limited versus Baldev Singh

Punjab National Bank versus Sh. Baltej Singh

Bank of India versus Pradeep Sharma

Hdfc Bank Ltd. versus Harjeet Singh Gill

Icici Bank Limited versus Ganesh Petroleum , through Its Proprietor, Yogesh Ganesh Butale