Dismissed
Uco Bank v. Farzeen Adil Millwala
DRTOA/90/2026
Case brief
AI extract
What is this about?
Order dismissing O.A. No.90 of 2026 due to non-appearance and lack of representation, indicating the applicant was not interested.
What did the court decide?
O.A. No.90 of 2026 stands dismissed and disposed of. Pending IAs, if any, stand disposed of.
What the court decided
AI extract
¶1
| 29.04.2026 | Exh. | Roznama-MDRT-II O.A. No.90 of 2026 |
Next date |
|---|---|---|---|
| None for the parties. | |||
| su– 24 | None appeared before the Ld. Registrar on previous date. Even today, no representation is made by the Applicant either personally or through the Advocate or through VC. It appears that the Applicant is not interested in pursuing this case any further. So, O.A. No.90 of 2026 stands dismissed and disposed of accordingly. Pending IAs, if any, stands disposed of. File be consigned to the Record Room after due compliance. Sd/- P.O. DRT-II |
Closed |
Parties & counsel
AI extract
- applicant
Applicant
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court