The applicant bank moved to withdraw its OA No. 90/2026, claiming the account was settled and seeking a refund of court fees. The tribunal allowed the withdrawal and ordered the refund.
Allowed the withdrawal of OA; directed refund of court fees.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court of the Presiding Officer Debts Recovery Tribunal, Jaipur
Item No. 40
Case No.OA/90/2026
RAJASTHAN GRAMIN BANK Vs HADMAN RAM HADMAN RAM
Date: 22.01.2026. Proceedings through hybrid mode Present:
Shri Anil Kumar Sharma, Counsel for the Applicant
Counsel for the Applicant bank submitted that the account is settled. He wants to withdraw this O.A and he prays for the refund of the court fees.
Heard the applicant.
The prayer for withdrawal of OA and refund of court fees is allowed. Registry is directed to refund the court fees as per rule. Accordingly, this OA stands disposed of.
File be consigned to record, as per rules. Copy of order be uploaded on website.
(Vimal Gupta) Presiding Officer Debts Recovery Tribunal, Jaipur
Rajasthan Gramin Bank
Hadman Ram Hadman Ram
Vimal Gupta
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
