Disposed

Ujjivan Small Finance Bank Limited v. Swapnil Balu Ahirkar

DRT25 Apr 2026OA/840/2024

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

A Debts Recovery Tribunal in Aurangabad disposed of original application no. 840 of 2024 after the applicant bank withdrew the petition following a settlement of the disputed dues amount by the defendant.

What did the court decide?

The original application No. 840 of 2024 was disposed of; withdrawal of application allowed; refund of court fees allowed; return of original documents permitted.

Ujjivan Small Finance Bank Limited versus Swapnil… — Contract and Commercial Disputes | DRT (2026)

¶1

¶2

I}I,]FOITE TIIE SP ECIAI- ANI) NA1'tON AI, I-O K ADA I,A1' oR(; ANISED ON 25A PRIL 2026 I}Y T IIT] I)[]t]TS I{ECOV ERY TRII]I]N AL AU IIANGAIlAI) .\t) DIS't RIC'T LE(;AL SERV ICES AUTHOITITY

¶3

OAN o. 8J 012021 Sr.no.1 58

¶4

oAW irh d rau'a I

¶5

A plicant s): Ujjivan Small Finance Bank Limi ted (hereinafter re ferred to as bank lfinancial institution )

¶6

VERSUS

¶7

I)e'fenda nt( s) : Swapnil Balu Ahirkar

¶8

(hereinafter referred to as / borrower / guarantor(s))

¶9

I)ct:r ils of dis pu te / cla inr The claim ofthe bank i s to the tune of Ils. 2309637.39/- with cost and interest.

¶10

,he defendant/s has paid the dues in his / their loan account an amount or Rs' 23'09'637 /- (RupeesTwenfy Three Lakh Nine Thousand six Hundrctr Thirt"v Seven onry) as settlement amount under o'r-S. Therefore, the appricant bank does not want to proceed l,rther. Hence present original Application may be withdrawn as per the Consent Terms/pursis fired by the appricant bank which is rnarked as^,A'.

¶11

'l'he request for retum of original documents as per rures is permittecr. Since the matter is before the Special and National Lok-Adalat, the court Fees be refunded to the applicant bank as per rules.

¶12

in view of the above consent Terms filed on record /uploaded onrine. The defendant is Present/absent today.

¶13

Appl nt(s)

¶14

Defenda nt(s)

¶15

dvocate for the AppIicant(s) /Authorised Represen tative

¶16

Advocate for the Defendant(s) /Authorised Representative

¶17

.,,,, € L

¶18

Adv. S:rnJay Nandurc NIem ber

¶19

Special and National Lok Adalat

¶20

Shri. Mak Adrvant Chairman Special and National Lok Aclalat

Date t 25,04.2026

Place : Aurangabad.

ORDER/AW.4RI)

In view of the above consent terms which are filed onrine/offline in the present matter, the order is passed. The oA No g40/2024 stands disposed of accordingly.

¶25

Refund of court Fees is alrowed as per rules. original documents be returned as per DRT procedure Rules.

¶26

Date : 25.01.2026

¶27

/ (-+)/ ( S h ri. illa kFra/n tl Adwa n t) CHAIRMAN Special and National Lok Adalat

Lrl(r *4i/01'-

6,tyaplzytoof fu*ls.

Printed on: 2.4 ADril 2026 at l2:18:3C

¶32

Debts Recovery Tribunals (DRTs)

¶33

GOVERNMENT OF INDIA I MINISTRY OF FINANCE

¶34

DEPARTMENT OF FINANCIAL SERVICES

¶35

Transaction Reference: 37 58/2026

¶36

Diary No 3758/2025 Applicant Name Ujjivan Small Finance Bank Limited Defendant Name SWAPNIL BALU AHIRKAR Date of Case Filling 24-04-2026

¶37

This is a compiiter-generated receipt and does not require a physi.al signature

¶38

<J-a

¶39

BEFORE THE HON'BLE^{DEBTS RECOVERY TRIBUNAL, AURANGABAD} 19 OF THE RECOVERY^{OF DEBTS AND} (APPLICATION UNDER SECTION BANKRU PTCY ACT, 1993)

¶40

Original Application No:^{84O of 2024} Ujjivan Small Finance^{Bank Ltd} ""Applicant

¶41

Versus

¶42

Swpanil Balu Ahirkar^{& another} ""'^Defendants

¶43

WITHDRAWL PURSIS

¶44

That the Applicant^{respectfully submitsas under that:-}

¶45

l) That, the Applicant^{bank submits preferred the present Original Application} bearing No.840 /2024^{file on 22.09} '2024^{the same is pendingfor Argument on} Original APPlication.

¶46

2l That, the Applicant^{submits that, the matter/disputes has been settled} betweenboththepartyandtherefore,ApplicarrtBankwantstowithdrawt}re Original Application^{by way of frlling this pursis for withdraw of Original} Application bearing^{No.84O/2O24r{-sur cldil} QfY-)ott*^{o{ E'3} 'z Jro9'634-

¶47

1. That, now there^{areno disputes and differencesbetweenApplicant Bank and} .^{Defendant i.e original borrowerarising out of present dispute regarding the} recovery of loan^{amount has receivedto the applicant.banksold in private} treatyforrecoveryarrdaccountclosed.Therefore,thepresentApplicantwants to withdraw the Original^{Application'As do not want to prosecute tJ:e same in} furtherancematterbedisposedolrasAccountClosed.oninstructionsand authorization of^{the bank officer'}

¶48

4lTherefore,thepresentpursisforwithdrawalofOriginalApplicationandallow the Applicant to^{withdraw the presentApplication and refund court fees as} per the law and oblige.

¶49

Hence this with&awal r31S. Applicant Bank

¶50

Date :- 2010212026 Place : - Aurangaba

¶51

Uiiivan Sm k Ltd R.S.Gangar'h^e '\U_ Advocate

Ujjivan Small Finance Bank Limited v. Swapnil Balu Ahirkar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Ujjivan Small Finance Bank Limited v. Swapnil Balu Ahirkar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Kotak Mahindra Bank Limited versus Gurjit Kaur

Kotak Mahindra Bank Limited versus Baldev Singh

Punjab National Bank versus Sh. Baltej Singh

Bank of India versus Pradeep Sharma

Hdfc Bank Ltd. versus Harjeet Singh Gill

Icici Bank Limited versus Ganesh Petroleum , through Its Proprietor, Yogesh Ganesh Butale