In a Debt Recovery Tribunal matter, the applicant bank's counsel stated the dispute was settled. The Original Application was dismissed as withdrawn upon being amicably settled.
OA 79312024 dismissed as withdrawn; matter settled.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Debts Recovery Tribunal-Il, Delhi
o[l793l2024
CANARA BANK (SYNDICATE BANK) Vs MR. LATESH YADA v PROPRTETOR OF M/S YADA V FOOTWEAR & ORS
20.05.2026
Item no. 48
Present: Ms. Seema Gupta, counsel for applicant bank. None for defendants.
Matter is taken through Video Conferencingl hybridMode.
The Ld. Counsel for applicant bank submitsthat the matterhas been settled between theparties. He requestedfor withdrawai ijf the present OA. Requestis allowed.
In view of the above submissionmade by the ld. Counselfor applicant bank, OA79312024 is dismissed as withdrawn,being amicably settled.
File be consigned to records.
I L .' . rrl' I -)t
,Ii
(susHIL KUI4AR RASTOGI) PRESIDING OFFICER, DRT-II, Dd}hi
''l; tt;
A
I .t ,:.:!i'i
CANARA BANK (SYNDIC BANK)
MR. LATESH YADA v PROPRTETOR OF M/S YADA V FOOTWEAR
SUSHEEL KUMAR RAJGUPTA
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
