In a matter referred to the National Lok Adalat, the parties settled the dispute. The Tribunal recorded the compromise based on an amount of Rs. 45,38,595.4 accepted by the bank and disposed of the case.
Settlement recorded for Rs. 45,38,595.4; matter disposed; original documents to be returned; date cancelled.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
i\ J
DEBTS RECOVERYTRIBUNAL.II,DELHI NATIONAL LOKADAUIT HELDON 22.03.2026(SUNDAYT
organised Bv:DRT-II, Delhi
Authoriw:DSLSA, Delhi
oLl77sl2023
Petitioner/APPlicant : HDFC BANK
DALIP SINGH RATHOREAND Defenda nt/ Respondent: ANOTHER
No. of Proceedingsof ttt" ItQ!!!-@!!|.of the Tribunal
Name of Presidingofficer : shri sushil Kumar Rastogi, Presidingofficer, DRT-II, Dethi &National Lok Adalat Judge
Name of Memberc(1) Mr. Yash Pal, Registrar, DRT',II,Delha
AWARD
This matter is takenby this Tribunal in hybridmodei.e. physical as well as through Video Conferencing.
The dispute betweenthe parties having been referrg! for determination to the National Lok Adalatand the parties having compromised/settledthe case/matter,the following Awardis passedin terms of the Settlement'
Present:- Ms.Purnima, counselfor applicant bank alongwith Ms. shubhangi Dayal, authorized rePresentative
The Ld. Counselfor applicant bank alongwithMs. ShubhangiDayafauthorized i.pi.i.ntutive submits'tiiatbank has recLivedan amountof Rs.45r38,595'4 towards full andfinal satisfaction of the claimsof the bank before NationalLok Adalat.
Accordingly, thedispute betweenthe parties stands amicablysettled'
This compromisesettlement betweenthe parties is suo mottoand with free will'
In these circumstances,compromise is recorded. Now, the matterstand disposed of in terms of compromiseand the original documents,if any, filed before DRT-II, Delhi be returned toapplicantbank.The Jate already fixed in the matter beforeDRTstands cancelled. Thefile be consignedto recordroom'
The applicant bank is to move an appropriateapplicationfor seeking refund of court fees. 9J
ROAC Defendant/ResPondent Petitioner/APP|icant
(
(Registrar) Member-I
s^\ (Prcsiding officer) DRT-II, Delhi & National Lok AdalatJudge
HDFC BANK
DALIP SINGH RATHORE
Sushil Kumar Rastogi
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
