Application for withdrawal of OA and refund of court fees in an outstanding maintenance case. The court declined the refund prayer, observing the relief was an amicable out-of-court settlement rather than a settlement through Lok Adalat or arbitration.
Application dismissed as withdrawn; prayer for refund of court fees declined.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Debts Recovery TribunaFll, Delhi
oA,l728l2025 YES BANK Vs GOODWILL PLASTIC INDUSTRIES
29.07.2026
Item no. 54
Present: Shri Ved Prakash Singh, counsel for applicant bank. None for defendants.
Matter is taken through Video Conferencing/ Hybrid Mode.
Para 6- The refund of couft fees is permissible only if, the matter is referrd to Arbitratr'o4 Conciliation, judrtrbl settlemenl including through Lok Adalat or medbtbn for settlement and the case is duidd in terms of such a settlement and not otherwise.
9\
Pan 7- In the caft at han4 the setflement in terms of which the wond appal was decidd by the High Court is not on reference to any of the aboue authorities/fora rather it was an amicable settlement out of the court
Para 8- Accordingly, we are of the opinion that the petitioner is not entitld to refund of the court fees and the High Court has not commitd any error or illqality in refising such a prayer."
Fib be consigned to record room.
c\i (susHrl KUmAR RASTOGT) PRESIDING OFFICER DRT-II, Delhi
P
Colour shows how this judgement treated each authority
Jage Ram Vs Ved Kaur & Ors.Referred¶10
SLP(c) No. 7231/2025 dated 28.01.2025 titled as Jage Ram Vs Ved Kaur & Ors.
Yes Bank
Goodwill Plastic Industries
Rajesh Kumar Rastogi
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
