Allowed

The Yes Bank Limited. v. Mr. Mohammad Mansoor

DRT28 Jan 2026OA/645/2025

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The Debts Recovery Tribunal allowed an Original Application filed by YES Bank Limited for recovery of Rs.24,52,375.05 with future interest and costs from two joint and several defendants who remained ex-parte. The court directed issuance of a Recovery Certificate.

What did the court decide?

Defendants jointly and severally liable to pay Rs.24,52,375.05 with future interest @ 12.23% p.a. and costs; issuance of Recovery Certificate.

The Yes Bank Limited. versus Mr. Mohammad Mansoor — Banking and Recovery | DRT (2026)

¶1

,ORTGIfiAL"

¶2

IN THE DEBTS RECOVERY TRIBUNAL-II AT HYDERABAD

¶3

DATED THIS THE 28TH DAY OF ]ANUARY, 2026

¶4

PRESENT: SH. RAMESHWAR KOTHE, B.Com., L.LB. (Hons.), M.A. PRESIDING OFFICER

¶5

ORIGINAL APPLICATION No: 645 OF 2025

¶6

The YES Bank Limited., Office at #1-8-387, 2rd Floot, Agravanshi Plaza, HUDA Lane, S.P Road, Secunderabad - 500003. Rep. by its Authorized Signatory.

¶7

.....Applicant.

¶8

Versus

¶9

Mr. Mohammad lvlansoor S/o. Mr. lvlohammad Eqbal, H.No.1-9 Rasnam Yelal, Rasnam Yelal KV Ranga Reddy, Telangana - 501121.

¶10

Ms. Molla Shameem Bequm D/o. lqr. Shaik f4azbuddin, H.No.1-9 Rasnam Yelal, Rasnam Yelal KV Ranga Reddy, Telangana - 501121.

¶11

...Defendants

¶12

: Mr. N. B. Sudarshan Counsel for the Applicant

Defendants

:Ex-parte

:: ORDER ::

The Applicant Bank filed the present OA for the recovery a total sum 'of Rs.24,52,375.05ps from the defendants^jointly and severally with future interest @1Bo/o p.a. from the date of application till the date of realization along with costs.

¶17

Summons served on D1 and 2. They were set ex-parte on 13.10.2025 as cal'ed absent a1d no representation.^{t^'.. '}

.. i.

oA,NO.645/2025

The Applicant Bank examined Sai Pavan Gudivada, Legal 14anager, as AW-1 and marked 05 documents through him as Ex. A.1 to Ex. A.05.

¶22

Heard the Ld. Counsel for the Applicant Bank.^perused the material placed on record.

¶23

The point that arises for consideration is:-

¶24

Whether the Applicant Bank is entitled for the claim made in the OA against the Defendants?

¶25

As stated supra, the Defendants remained ex-parte. The Evidence Affidavit coupled with the recitals in the documents viz., Exs. A.1 to A.05 marked on behalf of the Applicant Bank clinches the claim of the Applicant Bank against the Defendants. Hence, I hold that the Defendants are jointly and severally liable to pay the OA claim to the Applicant Bank with future interest and costs.

¶26

In the result, the present Original Application No.645/2025 is allowed as under: -

¶27

i) The Defendants are jointly and severally liable to pay to the Applicant Bank a sum of Rs.24,52,375.05ps with future interest @72.23o/o p.a. simple from the date of application till the date of realization;

¶28

ii) the applicant bank is also entitled to proceed against the person and properties of defendants for realization of its dues; Ary-^,,.tu (,,t^-rgtt,

¶29

oA.NO.645/202s

¶30

iii) the applicant bank is entitled for the costs.

¶31

The Applicant Bank is directed to file Cost Memo within 2 weeks from the date of receipt of this Order.

¶32

9 Issue Recovery Certificate accordingly.

¶33

0 Communicate a copy of this order to the parties concerned. (Dictated to the steno, corrected, signed and pronounced by me in the open court on this the 28th Day of January, 2026).

¶34

.l!)&

¶35

ESHWAR KOTHE) PRESIDING OFFICER

¶36

The Yes Bank Limited. v. Mr. Mohammad Mansoor

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

The Yes Bank Limited. v. Mr. Mohammad Mansoor

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Icici Bank Limited versus Smt. Uduthala Janakamma

Icici Bank Limited versus Vaka Chandra Shekar Reddy

M/s.Yes Bank Limited. versus Mr. Nagalla Rakesh

Union Bank of India versus M/s. Gulshan Fancy Sarees Center.

Bank of Baroda versus Laxmi

The Yes Bank Limited. versus M/s. Sarala Clearing Agencу.