Allowed

Yes Bank Limited. v. Mrs. Puja Vajra Rani

DRT18 Mar 2026OA/64/2026

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Debts Recovery Tribunal allowed an original application filed by YES Bank Limited for recovery of dues from Mrs. Puja Vajra Rani. The defendant remained absent, and the tribunal held the claim documented in the evidence stands clinched.

What did the court decide?

Summon served on sole defendant was set as ex-parte and no representation. The defendant is liable to pay the claim sum with future interest and costs.

Yes Bank Limited. versus Mrs. Puja Vajra Rani — Execution and Attachment | DRT (2026)

¶1

IN THE DEBTS RECOVERY TRIBUNAL-II AT HYDEMBAD DATED THIS THE 1BTH DAY OF MARCH, 2026 PRESENT: SH. RAMESHySTISIHF, B.Com., L.LB. (Hons.), M.A. PRESIDING OFFICER

¶2

OriginalApplication No: 64 OF 2026

¶3

YES Bank Limited., Office at 1-8-387, 2ND Floor, Agravanshi^plaza, HUDA Lane, S.P.Road, Secunderabad _ 5Ob0O3, Rep. by its Authorized Signatory.

¶4

.....Applicant

¶5

Versus

¶6

Mrs. Puja Vajra Rani, W/o. Abbu Hanumath Rao, Aged about 59 years, Occ: Service R/o. H.No.8-3-L9L/SLB/B, Near Sai Baba Temple, Vengal Rao Nagar, Ameerpet Hyderabad - 500038.

¶7

Also at:-

¶8

C/o. Southern Power Distribution Co. of Telangana, Super Intending Scada, GTS Colony, Kalyan Nagar, Erragadda Hyderabad - 500045.

¶9

, Defendant

¶10

Counsel for the Applicant

¶11

Mr. M. Srinivas Reddy

Defendants

Ex-parte

:: ORDER::

The Applicant Bank filed the present OA for the recovery of a sum of Rs.20,20,928.86ps from the defendant with future interest @18olo p.a. compounded with monthly rests from t6.09.2025 till the date of realisation along with ,orrt.fi\St,

¶16

OA.No.64/2026

¶17

Summon^{served on sole defendantand was set ex-parte} on t7.O3.2026^{as called absentand no representation'}

¶18

The Applicant^{Bank examinedSai Pavan Gudivada' LegalManager} asAW-landmarked06documentsthroughhimaSEx.A.ltoEx. A.06.

¶19

4 Heard the^{Ld. Counselfor the Applicant Bank and perused the} material Placed^{on record'}

¶20

¶21

The^point that^{arises for consideration is:-}

¶22

Whether the^{Appticant Bank is entitled for} the ctaim^{made in the OA against the} Defendant?

¶23

As stated supra,^{the Defendant remained ex-parte' The Evidence} Affidavit coupled^{with the recitals in the documents viz" Exs' A'1 to} A.06 marked on^{behalf of the Applicant Bank clinches the claim oi} the Applicant^{Bank againstthe Defendant'Hence' I hold that the} Defendant is^{liable to pay the OA claim to the Applicant Bank with} future interest^{and costs.}

¶24

In the result, the^{present Original ApplicationNo'64/2026is allowed} as under:^-

¶25

i) The Defendant^{is liable to pay to the} Applicant Bank^a sum of Rs.20,20,928.86Ps^with future interest @11.05o/o^{p.a. simple, from the date} of application^till the date of realization;

¶26

¶27

OA.No.64/2026

¶28

ii) the applicant bank is atso entiUed to proceed against

¶29

the person and properties of the defendant for

¶30

realization of its dues;

¶31

iii) the applicant bank is entiUed for the costs.

¶32

L The Appricant Bank is directed to fire cost Memo within 2 weeks from the date of receipt of this Order.

¶33

Issue Recovery Certificate accordingly.

¶34

10" communicate a copy of this order to the parties concerned. (Dictated to the steno., transcribed by him, corrected, signed and pronounced by me in the open court on this the lgth day of March, 2026).

¶35

ESHWAR KOTHE) PRESIDING OFFICER

Yes Bank Limited. v. Mrs. Puja Vajra Rani

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Yes Bank Limited. v. Mrs. Puja Vajra Rani

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

The Yes Bank Limited. versus Mr. Eragoti Nagaraju

Hdfc Bank Ltd. versus Nancherla Srinivas Babu

M/S. Canara Bank versus Rajampet Bikes

Yes Bank Limited. versus Mrs. Mutyala Chandrakala

Icici Bank Limited versus Mr Cns Labs Private Limited

Icici Bank Limited versus Morgula Kiran