Allowed

Bank of India v. M/s Arena Food and Agro Industries Private Limited (Afaipl)

DRT25 Jun 2026OA/63/2023

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Applicants:Bank faced default by Respondents: Arena Food Industries Pvt. Ltd. and guarantors. Bank filed OA u/s 19 RDB Act. Tribunal found application within limitation, evidence proved loan availed and default. Order: Allowed bank's claim. Defendants jointly/severally to pay Rs. 13.07 Cr with interest. Recovery Certificate issued.

What did the court decide?

Defendants jointly and severally to pay Rs. 13,07,17,940.40 with pendente-lite and future interest at 10% p.a. from 19.01.2023 till realization; Recovery Certificate issued.

Bank of India versus M/s Arena Food and Agro Industries… — Banking and Recovery | DRT (2026)

OA 63 of 20231 Jl

DRT, PATNA

Debts Recovery Tribunal, Patna

¶5

Karpuri Thakur Sadan, Aashiana Digha Road Patna-800025

¶6

Presiding Officer : Shri Kaushalendra Yadav

¶7

OA Case No. 63 of 2023

¶8

Bank of India, Branch at Sone Bhawan, Birchand Patel Path, Patha, Bihar

¶9

.Applicant

¶10

Vs.

¶11

M/s Arena Food and Agro Industries Private Limited (AFAIPL), a Private Limited Company registered office at Village and P.O.- Nimmi, P.S.- Sekhopur Sarai, District- Shekhpura, Bihar-811103, PAN No.AAKCA7472K, through its Managing Director Shri Radhey Sharma &Ors.

¶12

Shri Radhe Sharma, son of Late Harangi Singh, resident of Village + PO- Nimmi, District- Sheikhpura- 811103, Bihar, ANFPS3745 J

¶13

Shri Krishna Kumar, son of Late Harangi Singh, resident of House No.77, Nimmi Shekhopur Sarai, Sheikhpura- 811103, Bihar, PAN No.ARBPK3485H O

¶14

Shri Virendra Kumar, son of Shri Parasnath Singh, resident of B.V. College, Khajpura, District- Patna 800014, PAN No.AMHPK5312Q

¶15

Shri Parasnath Singh, son ofRanjeet Singh, resident of B.V. College, Khajpura, District- Patna 800014, PAN No. AXBPS60 14Q

¶16

Srimati Suruchi Kumari @ Sujata Devi, Wife of Late Subodh Kumar, resident of B.V. College, Khajpura, District- Patna 800014, PAN No. CCSPK4019F

¶17

. . . . . . . Defendants

¶18

Present:

¶19

For the Applicant Shri Ajit Kumar Sinha, Advocate For the Defendant No.2 Shri Raj esh Ranj an, Advocate Shri Bhola Shankar, Advocate For the Defendant No.4 Shri Arun Kumar, Advocate For the Defendant No.S & 6 Shri Manoj Kumar Choudhary, Advocate

¶20

Dated:25.06.2026

¶21

JUDGMENT

¶22

The Applicant bank has made this application u/s 19 of the Recovery of Debts and Bankruptcy Act, 1993 (here-in-after referred to as Act) on

RAp

OA 63 of 20231 Jl

DRT1 PATNA

19.01.2023 against the defendants to recover its debts from defendants of Rs.13907917,940.40 as on 05.01.2023 along with pendente-lite and future interest at the contractual rate from 06.01.2023with costs till realization.

¶28

The application has been filed with the contention that the applicant bark, is a body corporate, carries on the business and is competent to file the suit through various branches including the applicant.

¶29

Defendant no.1 is a private limited company dealing in the business of crushing (Mining) of stone chips etc of which defendant no.2 and 3 are the directors and also authorized signatories for execution of Security documents as Managing Director of the Company and Shri Krishna Kumar, Director as witness to it vide Board’s Resolution dated 15.02.2017. As per Memorandum of Association of the Company. The defendant no. 4 to 6 is the guarantors of the loan granted and availed by the defendant no.1 Company. The defendant no. 4 to 6 are also being sued as mortgagors, who created registered mortgage in favour of the applicant bank of their respective properties mentioned in Schedule-I of OA as securities.

¶30

Defendant no. 2 to 6 on behalf of the defendant no.I approached the applicant bank for sanction of working capital of Rs.5.47 Crores as overdraft (clean) facilities and Rs.3.50 Crores as cash credit, vide loan appjication, which were sanctioned by the applicant bank on 15.02.2017 against hypothecation of stone chips, book debts of stone crusher unit and collateral security of registered mortgage of properties on various terms and conditions, as stipulated in the sanction letter, which were duly accepted by the defendants. To secure the loan facilities defendants have executed various loan and security documents and hypothecated the movables and also created registered mortgage in favour of the applicant bank, details of which are given in OA. The defendants have also executed letter of acknowledgement of debts/securities dated 27.01.2020

¶31

After availing the sanctioned credit facilities, the defendants became irregular in repayment of their dues as per agreed terms and failed to adhere to the financial norms of the bank and avoiding the repayment of its dues to the bank, in spite of several assurances given by it to the applicant bank resulting in

¶32

VA Presidihg Oyicer Debt' Recovery TribmO PATrl A

OA 63 of 20231 Jl

DRT, PATNA

the account turning as NPA on 31.03.2021. After classification of the account as NPA, the applicant bank initiated the SARFAESI Action and issued possession notice on 15.06.2021.

¶37

Since, the defendants failed and neglected in spite of several reminders to make payment of the dues recoverable to the bank, hence this application has been filed by the bank. 1

¶38

The total liability in the loan account is Rs.13,07,17,940.40 as on 05.01.2023 with pendente-lite and future interest contractual rate from 06.01.2023 till the realization.

¶39

This Tribunal issued summons/notices copies of application & paper book to the defendants by registered/speed post on 16.12.2023, requiring them to show-cause within 30 days of the service U/s 19 (4) of the Act & Rule of the DRT [Procedure] Rules, 1993. In response to the notice, the defendant no.4 has appeared through his Id. Counsel by filing vakalatnama on 13.04.2023 but the defendant no.1,2,3,5 and 6 have not appeared, hence, the Registry of this Tribunal has ordered to publish the notice in newspaper and subsequently, substituted service by publication of notice by way of advertisement in newspaper was also made against them on 18.05.2023 in “Dainik Bhaskar” newspaper.

¶40

Despite the registered summons/notices and publication of notice in newspaper, the defendant no.1, 2, 3, 5 and 6 have not appeared before this Tribunal to contest the case. The sufficient time has been given to the defendants to defend their case, but they failed to appear and to file WS, hence, the Tribunal has passed an order to proceed ex-parte against them on 13.09.2023 and on that date it was further observed that written statement of defendant no.4 was filed after expiry of the statutory period hence it cannot be taken on record.

¶41

Thereafter the defendant no. 5 and 6 have also appeared through their Id. Counsel by filing vakalatnama dated 28.03.2024 and defendant no.2 on 26.12.2024. a / I:ab

¶42

PteSidinX o ficer &ebb Recovery Tribma} PATNA

DRT. PATNA

OA 63 of2023jJl

From perusal of the order sheets, it appears that an IA no. 604 of 2024 has been filed by the defendants to set aside the order dated 13.09.2023, whereby the case was proceeded ex-parte against the defendants. Said IA was dismissed vide order dated 25.09.2024 and it was further ordered on that date that the defendants were permitted to participate in the hearing by filing the rebuttal evidence, if any and the written statement filed on behalf of the defendants without any permission shall not be taken as a part of record.

¶47

Despite the direction of the Tribunal and sufficient opportunity, the defendants have not filed rebuttal evidence.

¶48

To prove its case, the applicant Bank has referred various certified photocopies of documents before this Tribunal. The applicant bank has also given evidence on affidavit by way of affidavit by Shri Shivshankar Kumar, Chief Manager of the applicant bank. The details of documents are as follows:

¶49

SI.No	Description Documents Photocopies of	Date of Execution	1Amount I(in Lakh)	ISignature 1Executants	of	1Ex./ Ann No
1	PowerofAttorne'	a				1
2	Memorandum Association of					2
3	BoardResolution	15.02.2017		Defendants		3
4	Loanapplication		576.00 350.00 100.00	Defendants		4
5	Sanctionletter	15.02.2017	547.00 350.00	Bank accepted defendants	and by	5
6	DPNote	16.02.2017	547.00	Def.no.1to3		6
7	L435	16.02.2017	547.00	Def.no.1to3		7
8	Declaration	16.02.2017		De£no.1to3		8
9	PDR	16.02.2017	547.00	Def.no.1to3		9
10	PDR	16.02.2017	547.00	Def.no.2to6		10
11	MCLR Agreement	16.02.2017	547.00	Defendants		11
12	L516	16.02.2017	547.00	Defno.1 to3		12
13	Deedofguarantee	16.02.2017	e			13
14	Hypothec loanagreement	16.02.2017	e			14
15	Agreement for bills 'urchase	16.02.2017		Defno.1to3		15
16	Letter ofundertakinj			Def.no.1to3		16
17	Letter ofundertakinj	e				17
18	Agreement	e	350.00			18

¶50

tab

¶51

I!IE)II e ]EIF 1EH: I } =Je :JIFf=M) PAT NI

OA 63 of2023jJI

DRT, PATN A

19	Letter of misc declaration/ undertaking/ authorities	16.02.2017	547.00 350.00	1Def.no.1to3	19
20	D P Note	16.02.2017	350.00	Def.no.1to3	20
21	L435	16.02.2017	350.00	Def.no.1to3	21
22	Declaration	16.02.2017		Def.no.1to3	22
23	MCLRAgreement	16.02.2017	350.00	Def.no.1to3	23
24	PDR	16.02.2017	350.00	Def.no.1to3	24
25	PDR	16.02.2017	350.00	Def.no.2to6	25
26	Deedofguarantee	16.02.2017	350.00	Def.no.2to6	26
27	L516	16.02.2017	350.00	Def.no.1to3	27
28	Photocopy ofdeed of mortgage alongwithvaluation report andCERSAl reDort	12.02.2017			28
29	Letterstodefendants	18.05.2019 27.06.2019 20.07.2019 29.08.2019		a
30	Acknowledgement of debt/securities	27.01.2020		Def.no.1to3	30
31	Notice	06.03.2020 15.09.2020		Bank	31
32	Photocopyof udgment	16.07.2022			32
33	Demand notice. representationand itsreply Possession notice	22.08.2022 22. 10.2022 02. 11.2022 01.12.2022		Bank Defendants	33
34A to 34 D	Statementof accounts			Bank	34Ato 34D

¶56

Heard arguments and perused the case record. During the course of arguments, there is no any specific denial on behalf of the defendants with regards to the sanction of loan facilities and its utilization and further there is no any specific denial with regards to the execution of loan and security documents in favour of the applicant bank.

¶57

Ld. Counsel of applicant bank submitted that the defendants have taken the loan and utilized the same and also executed the various loan documents to secure the loan. Further, submitted that the claim of the bank has been proved by documentary evidence. All the transactions were entered in the ledger of the loan accounts in the name of the defendant duly maintained by the applicant bank in its usual course of business. The interest /compound interest has been

¶58

Fr islaing C}B'ic gr D&bb Reclvery T„-bT.uta) F &:

OA 63 of20231Jl

DRT, PATNA

charged at such rates, and capitalized at such periodical rests as are permitted by and do not run counter to the directives of Reserve Bank of India.

¶63

It is further submitted by Id. Counsel of applicant bank that there is no stay granted by any Higher Court, in respect of the proceedings of the present OA and requested to issue recovery certificate, as claimed for, in OA.

¶64

It has been established that defendants are living and carrying on their business in the state of Bihar. Cause of action also arose in the State of Bihar. The said claim on the date of filing of application exceeded Rs.20 laos. The applicant bank is functioning within the jurisdiction of this Tribunal. Therefore, this Tribunal has territorial as well as pecuniary jurisdiction to adjudicate upon the present application.

¶65

On the issue of Limitation, to prove it, the applicant bank has submitted that the applicant bank has declared the account as NPA on 31.03.2021, whereas the present application has been filed on 19.01.2023. Even, it is counted for the purpose of Limitation, then it is established that the applicant bank has filed the case within the limitation period. As such, it is established that the present application has been filed well within the period of limitation.

¶66

Shri Shivshankar Kumar, Chief Manager of the applicant .bank has filed the affidavit in support of contents of application and the documents as evidence and proved on oath the pleadings and documents of the applicant bank as stated above.

¶67

Section 19(3) of the Recovery of Debts and Bankruptcy Act, 1993 provides that the application u/s S.19 (1) shall be accompanied with true copies of all the documents relied on in support of the claim.

¶68

The rule 12 (10) of the Debt Recovery Tribunal (Procedure) Rules, 1993, provides that if the defendant denies his liability to pay the claim made by the applicant, the tribunal may. act upon the affidavit of the applicant who is acquainted with the facts of the case or who has on verification of the record sworn the affidavit in respect of the contents of the application and the documents as evidence.

¶69

PresidinR Oficar Debtb Recovery Tribunal FATNA

OA 63 of 2023 IJl

DRT, PATNA

The rule 12 (11) of the aforesaid Rules, provides that the provisions contained in section 4 of the Banker’s Books evidence that Act, 1891 (18 of 1891) shall apply to a certified copy of an entry in a Banker’s Books furnished along with application filed under sub section 1 of section 19 by the applicant.

¶74

Section 4 of Banker’s Books evidence Act, 1891 runs as underS.4. Mode of proof of entries in bankers’ books.–Subject to the provisions of this Act, a certifIed copy of any entry in a banker ’s book shalt in all legal proceedings be received as prima facie evidence of the existence of such entry, and shall be admitted as evidence of the matters, transactions and accounts therein recorded in every case where, and to the same extent as, the original entry itself is now by law admissible, but not further or otherwise.

¶75

As such the certified true copies of the documents are admissible in evidence. The statement of account maintained in the ordinary course of business is not only admissible but shall be taken as the correct statement of account, more so since the entries in the statement of account have not been challenged.

¶76

On perusal of the application, documents, affidavit and on consideration of the arguments, it is proved that the defendants have applied for loan and the bank had sanctioned the loan and to secure the loan and for rep4yment of loan amount with interests etc., the defendants have executed various loan documents, as stated in the application and proved by aforesaid evidence. Defendants have neither denied the utilization of funds advanced by applicant bank nor have pointed out any specific error and discrepancy in the Statement of Account.

¶77

The evidence discussed above goes to establish that the amount of loan as mentioned in the O. A., was availed by the borrower under the agreed terms and conditions for repayment with interest. The balance amount till 05.01.2023 has been proved to be Rs.13,07,17,940.40 only by way of statement of accounts. There is nothing to prove the amount more than that disclosed in the aforementioned statement. As such this amount is recoverable till full and final realization of the claim.

¶78

In my view, facts of the case stand proved by evidence of the applicant bank. Accordingly, the applicant bank is entitled to recover from defendants jointly and severally of Rs.13,07,17,940.40 along with pendente-lite and future interest @10% p.a. simple from 19.01.2023 (The date of filing of this OA) till

¶79

\ab Pre;idinR 08'icer Debt:3 Recovery Tribunal F aT N A

OA 63 of 20231 Jl

DRT, PATNA

realization. So the final order may be passed accordingly, to meet the ends of Justrce.

¶84

ORDER

¶85

In the result, the application of the applicant bank is allowed and debt is determined with costs against the defendants. The defendants are hereby jointly and severally, ordered to pay the applicant bank its debt amounting to Rs.13,07,17,940.40 along with pendente-lite and future interest @ 10% p.a. simple &om 19.01.2023 (The date of filing of this OA) till realization of the entire sum due and recoverable with costs.

¶86

It is made clear that any amount deposited by the defendants, be deducted in the claim amount, if not deducted.

¶87

Defendants are debarred from transferring, alienating encumbering or otherwise dealing with or disposing of the mortgaged or hypothecated or any other properties and assets without paying the aforesaid adjudicated dues to the applicant bank to secure the ends of justice. The mortgaged or hypothecated assets to secure the loan in question are hereby attached and shall be subject to the final order under the recovery proceedings in pursuance of the Recovery certificate issued under Section 19(22) of Recovery of Debts and Bankruptcy Act 1993. The applicant may submit the certified copy of this Judgment and the Recovery Certificate before the Registrar/Sub- Registrar to endorse the charge over the secured assets.

¶88

Let a certificate of recovery be drawn up forthwith and put up for signatures in terms of provisions contained in Section 19(22) of the Act to be issued, on the basis of the order of the I'ribunal to the Recovery Officer. The Recovery Officer shall realize the amount as per the certificate in the manner and mode prescribed under the Act from the defendants, by sale of mortgaged/ hypothecated assets as well as other personal movable/immovable assets of the defendants. However, no proclamation of sale will be issued, if the Defendant/(:ertifrcate Debtor ensures payment of the certificate amount in 6 months from the date of demand notice to the Certiftcate debtors. The Recovery Oacer win issue demand notice to the CertiDcate debtors only after the proof of compliance under rule 16 of DIP (Procedure) Rules 1993, is submitted by

¶89

V\a . Plgstdi;B Once}r bIT RecOvery TribUtrJ \ q,A

OA 63 of 20231 Jl

DRT, PATN A

the applicant. If The Applicant/CertifIcate holder fails to comply with directions of the Recovery Officer, the execution may be dismissed for nonprosecution. The copy of this judgment be uploaded in the website of the Tribunal.

¶95

Parties are directed to appear before the Recovery Officer, DRT, Patna on 05.08.2026. The order be communicated accordingly.

¶96

Judgment signed, sealed, dated and pronounced in the .open court on 25th day of June, 2026.

¶97

Dictated &corrected by me.

¶98

[Kaushalendra Yadav] Presiding Officer Debts Recovery Tribunal, Patna Presiding Ofleo

¶99

-' II Recovety TribUnal D ATNA

¶100

FQIWI NOt 9

¶101

DEBTS RECOVERY TRIBUNAL PATNA

¶102

[See Regulation 24(1 )]

¶103

2nd Flwr) (A. B & F Wing) Karpuri Tbakur Sadmrp Kendriya Karamchui Pmisw (GPOA), Ashiana DiEha Road, Patna'800025

A 6thainT IrT-rim

Be No, 195/2026 IN

Case No: OA/63/2023

In the Matter of:

(CH. 1) BANK OF INDIA

¶109

BRANCH AT SONE BHAWAN, BIRCHAND PATEL PATH, PATNA ,BIHAR -80UD I

Applicant(s)

-–-– Versus ---–-

(CD. 1) M/S ARENA FOOD AND AGRO INDUSTRIES PRIVATE LIMITED (AFAIPL)

¶114

Though its Managing Director, Shri Radhcy Sharma and Ors. a Private Limited Company registered ofTice at Village and P.O.Nimmi, P.S.- Sekhopur Sarai, Sheikhpura,BIHAR

¶115

(CD- 2) SHRI RADHE SHARMA

¶116

SON OF LATE HARANGI SINGH. RESIDENT OF VILLAGE AND P.0.- NIMMI, DISTRICT- SHEIKHPURA811103, BIHAR,

¶117

(CD- 3) SHRI KRISHNA KUMAR

¶118

SON OF LATE HARANGI SINGH, RESIDENT OF HOUSE

¶119

NO. 77. NIMMI SHEKHOPUR SARAI, SHEIKHPURA-

¶120

811 103, BIHAR.

¶121

Defendant(s)

¶122

(CD. 4) SHRI VIRENDRA KUMAR

¶123

SON OF SHRI PARASNATH srNGH, RESIDENT OF B. V

¶124

COLLEGE, KHAJPURA, DISTRICT- PATNA- 800014.

¶125

(CD-5) SHRI PARASNATH SINGH

¶126

SON OF h\NJEET SINGH, RESIDENT OF B. V. COLLEGE,

¶127

KHAJPURA, DISTRICT- PATNA- 800014.

¶128

(CD- 6) SRIMATI SURUCHI KUMARI ALIAS SUJATA DEVI WIFE OF LATE SUBODH KUMAR. RESIDENT OF B. V.

¶129

COLLEGE, KHAJPURA, DISTRICT- PATNA- 800014.

¶130

Rt£QY£ry Certificate for Rs 130717940,40 1 RuBen Thin£tn GrQr£: Seven Lakh Seventeen Ttl#usgnds Nine Hgndrtd FQrty And Pajge FgrlyJIIljy_J

¶131

In terms of final order dated 25/06/2026 passed by this Tribunal in the above mentioned case, it is ordered that the Applicant Certificate Holder Bark is entitled to recover a sum of Rs. 1307 17940.40 along with cost, expenses and interest from the 19/01/2023 i.c. date of filing / with etTective date of the OA/63/2023 and future interest from order date till the date of realisation in full, jointly or severally from the Certificate Debtors, hereinafter referred to as:-

¶132

reno	CDName	Int. Type/Mode	Int. Rate	Effective Date	Order Date	}Amount(Rs.)	Liability Type	Interest(as on Order Date)	AmDit(Rs.	)Remark
I	M/S ARENA FOOD AND AGRO INDUSTRIES PRIVATE LIMITED(AFAIPL)	N=ICI; )nteRst	-lo	19/01/20 23	25/1L1151}/202 6 }	130 71711Eb1MOB40	aiBIrd	B:::elsE)icon	130717940.4
	SHRIRADHESHARMA	’early )	10	19/01/2023		1307 17940.40		B::EIsE:tsco	n130717940.4
3	SHRIKRISHNAKUMAR	;imple Interest Yearly )	10	19/01/2023	25/06/20261	1307 17940.40		B:ir£sbJ:icon	130717940.4	{–--––
	SHRIVIRENDRAKUMAR	?{T£l;l)ntercst	lo			1307 17940.40	lyAnd	A:TeFLleon	130717940.4
	SHRIPARASNATHSINGH	SimpleInterest (Yearly)	10	19/01 /2023		130717940.40	And	B:::rsbJ:tseon	130717940.4
6	SIUMATISURUCHI KUMARI ALIASSUJATADEVI	SimpleInterest (Yearly)		L9/01/2023	;/06/2026]	130717940.40	And ly	U:::ersbJ:tseon	130717940.4

¶133

In case of failure to pay the aforementioned adjudicated amount within 30 days, same shall be recovered from the sale of the mongaged/hypothecated assets as well as other personal movable/ Immovable assets of the certificate debtors

¶134

The moRgagcd or hypothccatcd assets to secure the loan in question are hereby attached and shall be subject to the final order under the recovery proceeding in pursuance of the Recovery certificate issued under Section 19(22) of Recovery of Debts and Bankruptcy Act 1993. Panics are directed to appear before ASHISH KUMAR , Recovery Officer, DEBTS RECOVERY TRIBUNAL PATNA on 05/08/2026

¶135

The Recovery Officer shall realize the amount as per this Certificate in the maimer and mode prescribed WIder Sections 25 to 28 of the Recovery of Debts Due to Banks and Financial Institutions Act, 1993 (as amended from time to time) from the above named Certificate Debtors

¶136

This Certificate has been issued under my signature and seal of the Tribunal on this 02/07/2026

¶137

Gav _ Registrar

¶138

PRESIDING OFFICER DEBTS RECOVERY TRIBUNAL PATNA 1E1111Bb1:11) : ::33:i 1 ::1:11U1B)

¶139

D e!!!:1F Be a=: n a

¶140

FORM NO. 10

¶141

[See Regulation 24(2)]

¶142

DEBTS RECOVERY TRIBUNAL PATNA

¶143

2nd Floor, (A. B & F Wing) Karpuri Thakur Sadan, Kendriya Karamchari Parisar (GPOA), Ashiana Digha Road, Patna-800025 .

¶144

SCHEDULE TO RECOVERY CERTIFICATE MEMO OF COSTS

RC No. 195/2026

Case No: OA/63/2023

Applicant(s): BANK OF INDIA Versus

¶149

Defendant(s): M/S ARENA FOOD AND AGRO INDUSTRIES PRIVATE LIMITED (AFAIPL)

¶150

Item ofCosts	:AmountinRs
Feeon theapplicatM	150000
ProcessFees(Inc.Publication)	go
AdvocateFees	0
Com;iissione;/ki8e-i;&;/V;hiii'iiAiii;iij-Fbi	0
ⅈc;ilaneaf£-chaia	0
TotalCosts:Rs	150000

¶151

Place: PATNA

¶152

Date: 02/07/2026

¶153

PRESIDING OFFICER DEBTS RECOVERY TRIBUNAL PATNA

¶154

][\IF 0 t e : S 1L1[iILIiIIbR e 0 U t IIIIyrh i C h ever is not app h cable

¶155

DdoCU £Je Jq Sun A PATNA

Bank of India v. M/s Arena Food and Agro Industries Private Limited (Afaipl)

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Bank of India v. M/s Arena Food and Agro Industries Private Limited (Afaipl)

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Hdfc Bank versus Bhajan Singh

Canara Bank versus P Padmanabhan

Uco Bank versus Mr Abdul Rouf And Anr.

M/S Mahavir Food Products versus Uco Bank

State Bank of India versus Ms Pappu and Dipu Aloo Co.

Central Bank of India versus M/s Royal Metal