Quashed

Bank of India v. Ismat Javeria Shaikh Imran

DRT25 Apr 2026OA/603/2025

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

A special and national lok adalat disposed of an Original Application filed by Bank of India against a borrower/guarantor. The matter was withdrawn as dues were settled under OST, leading to an order quashing the OA, refunding fees, and returning documents.

What did the court decide?

Original Application No. 603/2025 is disposed of; refund of court fees permitted; original documents to be returned.

Bank of India versus Ismat Javeria Shaikh Imran — Banking and Recovery | DRT (2026)

¶1

BEFORX THE SPECIALANDNATIONALLOK ADALAT ORGANISED ON 25APRIL.2026 BY THE DEBTS RECOVERY TRIBUNAL. AURANGABAD AND DISTRICT LEGAL SERVICES AUTHORITY

¶2

OA No. 603/2025 (Sr.no.32 )

¶3

OA Withdrawal

¶4

A n olicant^(s): Bank Of India

¶5

(hereinafter referred to as bank / financial institution)

¶6

VBRSUS

¶7

Defendant(s) ! Ismat Javeria Shaikh Imran (hereinafter referred to as / borower / guarantor(s))

¶8

Details of dispute / claim: The claim of the bank is to the tune of Rs. 3981022.95/- with cost and interest.

¶9

The defendant/s has paid the dues in his / their loan account an amount of Rs. 11,30,000 /- (Rupees Eleven Lakh Thirty Thosand only) as settlement amount under OTS. Therefore, the applicant bank does not want to proceed further. Hence present Original Application rnay be withdrawn as per the Consent Terms/Pursis filed by the applicant bank which is marked as 'A'.

¶10

The request for retum of original documents as per rules is pemitted. Since the matter is before the Special and National Lok-Adalat, the Court Fees be refunded to the applicant bank as per rules,

¶11

in view of the above ConsenVPursis Terms filed on record /uploaded online. The defendant is Present/absent today.

¶12

Applicant(s)

¶13

Aar 3iiw EiBqr or, B OF INDIA {tEI 9d$6 / er A 6oauebrt.ftorhppitreant(s) /Authorisccl Representative

¶14

Defe nda n t(s)

¶15

Advocate for the Defendant(s) /Authorised Rep resentative

¶16

o- I L{

¶17

Adv. Sanjay Nandure Member

¶18

Special and National Lok Adalat

¶19

Shri. M nd Adwant Chairman Special and National Lok Adalat

Date : 25.04.2026

Place : Aurangabad.

ORDER/AWARD

In view of the above consent terms which are filed online/oft'line in the present matter, the order is passed. The OA No 603/2025 stands disposed of accordingly.

¶24

Refund of Court Fees is allowed as per rules. Original documents be returned as per DRT Procedure Rules.

¶25

, (J4//

¶26

Date t 25.04.2026

¶27

(Sh ri. Ma\af-a nd Adwa n t) CHAIRMAN Special and National Lok Adalat

¶28

¶29

¶30

BEFORE THE SPECIALANDNATIONAL LOK ADALAT ORGANISED ON 25th APRIL.2O26 BY^THE DEBTS RECOVERY TRIBUNAL. AURANGABAD C

l.t

99.9.1.:ozs^,

WITHDRAWAL PURSIS

Applicant(s): Bar>K^{oF f-rldj'o_}

¶36

VERSU S

¶37

Defendant(s):^{fsrrn+- lovetfq} €hcrilzh J-rDcrra-F, ( hereinafter referred to as / borrower / guarantor(s) )

¶38

Details of dispute / claim: The claim of^{the bank is to the tune of} ns. ilr€h9.1L;.lfwith cost and interest.

¶39

The defendant/s has paid the dues in^his /^{theirloan account an amount} trf{rll\ of Rs. llt3.?r9.0.9...(R "WA:'Only )^{as settlement amount underOTS.} Therefore, the applicant bank does^{not want to proceedfurther.Hence present} Original Application may be^{withdrawnas per the present withdrawalPursis} filed by the bank

¶40

The request for retum of original documents^{as per rules maybe} permitted. Since the matter is befoie the Special^{and National Lok-Adalat, the} Court Fees may^please be^{refundedto the applicant bank as per rules.}

¶41

3iiw rm(ffi SEqr N IA Chief s U Advocate or /Authorised Representative

¶42

Defendant(s)

¶43

sd/Advocate for the Defendant(s) /Authorised Representative

¶44

Date : 25-4-2026 Place : Aurangabad.

¶45

\a i:

¶46

\a i:
M Gmail q lsmat
=
EJ
, Composo
hrl
Regarding withdrawal of matter from DRT D lnbox x rvithd6walMails x
lnt or 159
Chat Arrchata! 206 Jalne
o Rsspocl.d Sir/M.dam. With leforence to caplionod subiocl. 0ls glvon ac.ounls was fled und€t DRT, bul as ac.ounl 3c
More
Jalna
Leb6ls
o
Account statements
ORT Objeclion
R.3P.ct.d 5lr/Madam,
lmp Mail
NEC With reference to captioned subiect, the given accounts were filed under DRT, but as accor
NPA oATA forwarded by ... mentioned accounts from DRT
The details are as follows
Ob,oction Remorel
1. Shivkant Harishchandra ShuEalsmat Javeria shaikh lmrtnvaljanti MaddaluArKrishna I
POA
printed
Summons published in n...
withdrswal Mails
Reply Reply all
wtitten Statement
More

Bank of India v. Ismat Javeria Shaikh Imran

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Bank of India v. Ismat Javeria Shaikh Imran

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Kotak Mahindra Bank Limited versus Gurjit Kaur

Kotak Mahindra Bank Limited versus Baldev Singh

Punjab National Bank versus Sh. Baltej Singh

Bank of India versus Pradeep Sharma

Hdfc Bank Ltd. versus Harjeet Singh Gill

Icici Bank Limited versus Ganesh Petroleum , through Its Proprietor, Yogesh Ganesh Butale