Bank of Baroda v. Kamesh Kumar K M Foods
Case brief
What is this about?
Registrar DRT-II, Delhi, declined registration of an application for failing to remove registry-raised defects despite prior opportunities.
What the court decided
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE DEBTSRECOVERYTRIBUNAT-II,DELHI
Date:04.05.2026
N DN/439 I2026 IDRT{ t/Del hi (oA)
BANK OFBARODA vs KAMESH
lthasbeenobservedthatdespiteprovidingtheseveral opportunitiestheapplicant has notremoved the oLjections/defectsraisedby the Registry'till date'
lntermsofpowerconferredbyRule23readwithRule 5( ) ofDRT (Procedure)Rules, 1993, as amendedfrom time to time,theaforesaidoA.isherebydeclinedtoberegistered. Copy of orderto be uploadedon DRT website' a .0
(Yash Pal) Registrar DRT-Il,Delhi
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court