Allowed

Punjab National Bank v. Sanjay Limbraj Mahandule

DRT26 Feb 2026OA/508/2024

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Debts Recovery Tribunal allowed an original application filed by Punjab National Bank to recover Rs. 26,15,995/-. The defendant appeared ex-parte. The tribunal ordered payment of the principal sum along with future interest at 7% per annum simple interest from the date of filing.

What did the court decide?

Respondent directed to pay Rs. 26,15,995/- with future interest at 7% p.a. (simple) from filing date; Recovery Certificate issued; Bank entitled to sell mortgaged properties.

Punjab National Bank versus Sanjay Limbraj Mahandule — Banking and Recovery | DRT (2026)

¶1

Presented on: 18.02.2024 Registered on: 09.07.2024 Decided on: 26.02.2026 Duration: Y M D 02 00 08

¶2

IN THE DEBTS RECOVERY TRIBUNAL AT AURANGABAD (Before Dr. J. R. Chauhan Presiding Officer) ORIGINAL APPLICATION No. 508/2024

¶3

TOTAL CLAIM AMOUNT – Rs. 26,15,995/-

¶4

Punjab National Bank,

¶5

A Body Corporate constituted under the Banking companies (Acquisition & Transfer of Undertakings) Act 1970, having its Head Office at Plot No. 4, Sector10, Dwarka, New Delhi-110075, and one of its Branch at Ghogargaon , Taluka Shrigonda, District Ahmednagar, through its Attorney Mr. Rahul N. Potphode .

¶6

… Applicant

¶7

Versus

¶8

Sanjay Limbraj Mahandule, Age: 35 years, Occ.: Business, R/o.: At Ruikhel, Post Mandavga, Tal. Shrigonda, Dist. Ahmednagar-01.

¶9

…Defendant

¶10

APPEARANCES

¶11

For the Applicant For Defendant

¶12

Mr. Sameer J. Pande -Advocate Ex-parte

(OA No.5082024)

Page 1 of 9

[AMBADAS]

JUDGMENT

Delivered on 26.02.2026

¶18

The Applicant Bank has filed the present application for the recovery of a sum of Rs. 26,15,995/- (Rupees Twenty Six Lacs, Fifteen Thousand, Nine Hundred and Ninety Five only), along with future interest from the date of filing of the Original Application, i.e., 18.02.2024, until the date of realization of the entire outstanding dues from the Defendant.

¶19

Brief facts of the application are as under:

¶20

The Applicant Bank states that the Defendant had approached and requested the Applicant Bank for Cash Credit Facility. Upon considering the request and financial needs of the Defendant, the Applicant Bank Sanctioned Cash Credit Facility of Rs. 15,00,000/as agriculture credit vide sanction letter dated 09.09.2016 on certain terms and conditions. The Defendant also agreed to pay additional interest @2% by way of liquidated damages in the event of any default in repayment.

(OA No.5082024)

Page 2 of 9

[AMBADAS]

In order to secure the aforesaid loan facility, the Defendant executed various loan documents in favour of the Applicant Bank. These included sanction letter, letter of undertaking, registered mortgage deed bearing daybook No. 3138/2016 dated 16.08.2016 etc., in favour of the Applicant Bank

¶25

The Applicant Bank further contends that, in order to secure the aforesaid loan facility, the Defendant executed mortgage deed bearing daybook No. 3138/2016 dated 16.08.2016 in favour of the Applicant Bank. The mortgage was created in respect of the following properties:

¶26

i) All that piece and parcel of Agricultural Land admeasuring 1.22 H.R., Part of Gut No. 57 of Village Ruikhel, Tal. Shrigonda, District Ahmednagar, which is bounded as under:

¶27

East: Road,

¶28

West: Land of Gut No. 59, North: Land of Gut No. 60, South: Land of Gut No. 55.

¶29

ii) All that piece and parcel of Agricultural Land admeasuring 1.57 H.R., Part of Gut No. 112 of Village Ruikhel, Tal. Shrigonda, District Ahmednagar, which is bounded as under: East: Land of Gut No. 115, West: Land of Gut No. 111,

(OA No.5082024)

Page 3 of 9

[AMBADAS]

North: Land of Gut No. 119, South: Land of Gut No. 116.

¶34

iii) All that piece and parcel of Agricultural Land admeasuring 22.54 H.R., Part of Gut No. 140 of Village Ruikhel, Tal. Shrigonda, District Ahmednagar, which is bounded as under: East: Land of Gut No. 141, West: Land of Gut No. 144, North: Land of Gut No. 145, South: Road.

¶35

iv) All that piece and parcel of Agricultural Land admeasuring 1.38 H.R., Part of Gut No. 148 of Village Ruikhel, Tal. Shrigonda, District Ahmednagar, which is bounded as under: East: Road, West: Land of Gut No. 155, North: Road, South: Land of Gut No. 147.

¶36

v) All that piece and parcel of Agricultural Land admeasuring 1.60 H.R., Part of Gut No. 154 of Village Ruikhel, Tal. Shrigonda, District Ahmednagar, which is bounded as under: East: Land of Gut No. 155, West: Land of Gut No. 153, North: Road, South: Land of Gut No. 151.

¶37

The applicant bank contended that the defendant has failed to keep his promise and commitments agreed by him with regard to due repayment of the loan amount. The defendant failed to operate the loan account properly and failed to pay the agreed

(OA No.5082024)

Page 4 of 9

[AMBADAS]

rate of interest as per terms and conditions of the sanction letter. Thereafter, the applicant bank repeatedly made demand of loan amount and called upon the defendant to pay with the agreed rate of interest thereon, but the defendant failed and neglected to pay the same. The loan account of the defendant became irregular and classified as NPA. Therefore on 05.01.2023 the applicant bank issued legal notice to the defendant through their advocate. Despite service of Notices, the defendant failed and neglected to repay the outstanding dues of the applicant Bank. Hence, this application is filed.

¶42

The defendant failed to appear in matter though he was served through summons. Hence, the defendant was proceeded ex-parte as per Order dated 22.01.2025.

¶43

The applicant Bank has filed Evidence Affidavit of evidence at Exhibit-4 of Mr. Rahul s/o. Nathaji Potphode, Power of Attorney Holder of the applicant Bank, and has produced on record the original loan transaction documents as Annexure A-1 to A-13

(OA No.5082024)

Page 5 of 9

[AMBADAS]

along with list of documents Exh.5 which corroborates the case of the applicant Bank.

¶48

I have heard arguments of the learned Advocate for the applicant Bank.

¶49

Since the defendant failed to appear and contest the application, I find no reason to disbelieve the unrebutted evidence of the applicant Bank. Therefore, the applicant Bank is entitled for the reliefs as claimed.

¶50

The applicant Bank has claimed charge over immovable properties of the borrowers which are mortgaged in favour of the applicant bank.

¶51

The applicant Bank has claimed future interest @15% p. a. from the date of filing i.e. 18.02.2024 of this application till realization of the claim amount. However, considering the facts of the case, I am of the opinion that if future interest is granted @ 7% per annum (simple), it would be just and reasonable rate of interest.

(OA No.5082024)

Page 6 of 9

[AMBADAS]

ORDER

(A) Original Application No. 508/2024 is allowed with costs.

¶57

(B) The defendant shall pay jointly and severally to the applicant Bank a sum of Rs. 26,15,995/- (Rupees Twenty Six Lacs, Fifteen Thousand, Nine Hundred and Ninety Five only), along with future interest @ 7% per annum (simple) from the date of filing of the O.A. i.e. 18.02.2024 till full payment/realization of the amount mentioned in this operative order.

¶58

(C) The aforesaid adjudicated amount is secured by the mortgage of the following immovable properties vide document at Annexure A-2 in list of documents Exh. 5.

¶59

i) All that piece and parcel of Agricultural Land admeasuring 1.22 H.R., Part of Gut No. 57 of Village Ruikhel, Tal. Shrigonda, District Ahmednagar, which is bounded as under:

¶60

East: Road, West: Land of Gut No. 59, North: Land of Gut No. 60, South: Land of Gut No. 55.

(OA No.5082024)

Page 7 of 9

[AMBADAS]

(OA No.5082024)

Page 8 of 9

[AMBADAS]

South: Land of Gut No. 151.

¶72

(D) The applicant Bank is entitled to sell the mortgaged immovable properties and hypothecated articles/goods

¶73

etc., to recover its dues.

¶74

(E) Issue Recovery Certificate accordingly.

¶75

(F) The Registrar is directed to send the copy of the Judgment and Recovery Certificate to the applicant and defendant.

¶76

(G) File be consigned to the record room.

¶77

Sd/-

¶78

Pronounced in open court. (Dr. J. R. Chauhan) Place: Aurangabad Presiding Officer Date:.26.02.2026 Debts Recovery Tribunal, Aurangabad

¶79

(OA No.5082024)

¶80

Page 9 of 9

¶81

[AMBADAS]

Punjab National Bank v. Sanjay Limbraj Mahandule

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Punjab National Bank v. Sanjay Limbraj Mahandule

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Bank of Baroda versus M/S Smk Global Security Solutions Pvt. Ltd.

Canara Bank versus M/S Arth Construction

Idbi Bank versus Mina W/o Satyaprem Mehta

State Bank of India versus Vishal Bhagwan Gaikwad

Ms Mavin Switchgears and Control Pvt. Ltd. versus State Bank of India

Mavin Infra Private Limited versus State Bank of India