Award of the DRT-II, Delhi, National Lok Adalat recording a compromise settlement in proceedings No. 54 between the applicant bank and the respondent, disposing of the matter.
The matter was disposed of upon recording of the compromise settlement; the dispute between the parties stands amicably settled.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
a
DEBTS RECOVERYTRIBUNAL-IIDELHI
organisedBv:DRT-II,DethiAuthoriW:DslsA,Delhi
oAl49412O2s
Petitioner/Applicant: ICICI BANKLIMITED
Defendant/Respondent:JINTENDRAKUMARANDANR
No. ofproceedingsof the ItgmNO.54-of the Tribunal
Name ofpresidingofficer : Shri Sushil Kumar Rastogi, Presidingofficer, DRT-II, Delhi& National Lok Adalat Judge
Name of Members(1) Mr. Yash Pal, Regi$rar, DRT-II,Delhi
AWARD
This matter istaken by this Tribunal in hybrid mode i.e. physical as well as through Video Conferencing.
The disputebetween the partieshaving been referrg! for determination to the National Lok Adalaiindthe'partieshavin[ compromised/settled the case/matter,the following Awardis passedin terms of the Settlement'
Present:-Mr. Robin Singh, authorized representativefor applicant bank
Mr. Robin singh,authorized representative submits that bank has received an amount oi ns.f f,Sg,fitiOl-towards full andfinal satisfaction of the claims of the bank before National LokAdalat
Accordingly,the dispute betweenthe parties stands amicablysettled'
This compromisesettlementbetweenthe partiesis suo mottoand with free will'
In these circumstances,compromise is recorded. Now, the matterstand disposed of in terms of compromiseand the original documents,if any, filed before DRT-II, Delhi be returnedto applicantbank.The Jate already fixed in the matter beforeDRT stands cancelled.The file be consigned to recordroom'
The applicantbank is at libefi to move an appropriate applicationfor seeking refund of court fees. #
ROAC Petitioner/ApplicantROACDefendant/Respondent s
(Registrar) Member-I
I^ (Presidrhg rr..)cer) DRT-II, Delhi& National Lok AdalatJudge
ICICI Bank Limited
Jindera Kumar Andanr
Shri Sushil Kumar Rastogi
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
