Hdfc Bank Ltd. versus Sanjay Kumar Sharma

The dispute between the parties having been referred for determination to the National Lok Adalat and the parties having compromised/settled the case/matter, the following Award is passed in terms of the Settlement. ,

¶13

Present:- Shri Ajay Uppal, Counsel for applicant bank

¶14

The Ld. Counsel for applicant bank submits that bank has received an amount of Rs.40O000/- towards full and final satisfaction of the claims of the bank before National Lok Adalat.

¶15

Accordingly, the dispute between the parties stands amicably settled.

¶16

This compromise settlement between the parties is suo motto and with free will.

¶17

In these circumstances, compromise is recorded. Now, the matter stand disposed of in terms of compromise and the original documents, if any, filed before DRT-II, Delhi be returned to applicant bank. The date already fixed in the matter before DRT stands cancelled. The file be consigned to record room.

¶18

applicant bank is at liberty to move an appropriate application for seeking refund court fees.

¶19

RoAc Petitioner/Applicant RoAc Defendant/Respondent { (Registrar) Member-f sA\ (Presidirfg onicer) DRT-II, Delhi & National Lok Adalat Judge

Hdfc Bank Ltd. v. Sanjay Kumar Sharma

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Hdfc Bank Ltd. v. Sanjay Kumar Sharma

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases