Canara Bank v. Nagamma
Case brief
What is this about?
In an application under Section 19 of the RDB Act, the Tribunal allowed the recovery of dues against legal heirs and co-mortgagors. The court rejected defenses of non-participation and fabrication, holding mortgagors jointly liable and one heir liable only to the extent of inherited estate.
What did the court decide?
Recovery certificate to be drawn for Rs. 49,50,241/- with 6% simple interest; co-mortgagors and co-obligant jointly liable; one heir liable only to extent of inherited estate.
What the court decided
IN THE DEBTS RECOVERY TRIBUNAL II, BENGALURU
Dated this 30th Day of June, 2026
Present: Sri. T. RAJESH Presiding Officer OA.No.48/2023
BETWEEN:
Canara Bank,
T. Narasipura Branch, Municipal Office Road, T. Narsipura, Mysore District -571124, Rep. by its Manager & PA Holder,
…APPLICANT
AND:
- Smt. Nagamma (Deceased) W/o. Late Basavanna
- Sri. Shiva Kumar, S/o. Late Basavanna,
- Sri. Kantraju, S/o. Late Basavanna,
- Smt. Prema, D/o. Late Basavanna,
Issues for consideration
2 issues framed by the court
Whether the applicant succeeded in proving the OA claim against the defendants?
If so, to what extent?
Parties & counsel
- applicant
Canara Bank, T. Narasipura Branch
- respondent
Smt. Nagamma
- respondent
Sri. Shiva Kumar
- respondent
Sri. Kantraju
- respondent
Smt. Prema
- respondent
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court