The Tribunal allowed the ex-parte claim by State Bank of India for recovery of ₹27,45,382 dues from the respondent under the Recovery of Debts and Bankruptcy Act, 1993.
Recovery of Rs. 27,45,382 with 10.15% p.a. interest; recovery certificate issued; 30 days to pay; bar on alienation of properties.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
BEFOR,ETHEDEBTS RECOVERY TRIBUNAL-I[KOLKATA
PRESENT:-SRI ARBINDMADHAV
PRESTDINGOFFICER OF DRT'II KOLKATA
ADDITIONALCHARGE OF DRT-IIIKOLKATA
o.A. NO.479 0F 2024
DATE OF DELMRYOF ORDER: 3olo412026
State Bank ofIndiais a body corporateconstituted under the StateBank of India ;.t lqss havind its Coroorate Centre at StateBank of India Bhawan, l4adam Cama 'o"Ja. lir.u"i-+'ooo2i and its local Head office at 1, Strand Road, Kolkata-700001' ;;;i";l;;;" il;ineis ttr.oughits differentbranches includingat sl4Eccc'small a llJum e-ntero.ises citvCredit Centre, commonly knownas "S14Eccc" Eallygunge' io-e, curiur,"t -noad, 46 Floor, Kolkata-700019, PS- Gariahat, Phone No: 033 liiigiigt-ziotsoos,e-mait:soi,t sz+:@sbi.co in, within the jurisdiction of this Ld' Tribunal.
Applicant Bank,
-Versus-
Defendant.
Counsel for the Applicant Bank: -
Anirban Pramanick, Advocate,
Set ex-parte on 22/04/2026
JUDGEMENT
3, The Applicant Bank examined 7 documents through Sri pushpak Biswas, Chief t4anager marked as Exhibit Annexure-A to Exhibit Annexure-c.
4, Heard the Ld. Counsel for the Applicant Bank,
The point that arises for consideration is :
6
--l
Whether the ApplicantBankls entitledto the clalm made ln the OA againsttheDefendants and OA schedulepropertiesas prayedfor?
As stated supra, theDefendants remained absent and did not turnup to controvert the veEion of the O.A. ofAppllcant Bank.The EvidenceAffidavltcoupled with the recitals in the documents viz.,Exhibit Annexure-A to Exhlbit Annexure-G markedon behalf of the Applicant Bank, establishedthe clalm of the Applicant Bank againsttheDefendants andOA scheduleproperties, Hence, I hold that the Defendants are jointly and severally liable to pay to the Applicant Bank the clalmsmade in the OA with future interest and costs'
In the result, thepresent OriginalAppllcationls allowed ex-parte withcosts, as under:-
ORDER
Accordingly, the Original Application being O.A. No. 479 of 2024 is allowed and stands disposed of.
Copy of the Judgement/Final Order be uploaded in the Tribunal,s website, File is consigned to the Record Room.
(Dictated to steno. transcribed by her, corrected, siqned and pronounced by me in the open Court on the 3orh day of April, 2026)
t
PRESTDTNG oFFrcERTdF'o?t-ffr orxnrn ADDITIONAL CHARGE OF DRT.III I(OLKAIA
Debts Recovery Tribunal-3, Kolkata Order Sheet (Continuation)
Case No, OA No. 479 ol 2.J24 State Bank of India
vs.
Order with signature
Order No.19
Order pronounced (vlde separate sheets).
pt.30t04t2026
In the result, O.A. No. 479 of 2OZ4 ts allowed wtth costs. Issue
Recovery Certlfi cate accordingly.
(Arbind Madhav )
Presiding Officer
DRT-2, Kotkata
Additional Charge of DRT-3, Kotkata
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the Applicant Bank is entitled to the claim made in the OA and recovery of schedule properties against the Defendants
1 provisions across 1 enactments
State Bank of India
Sri Subhajit Ghosh
Arbind Madhav
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
