The Debts Recovery Tribunal allowed the original application filed by State Bank of India for recovery of a sum of Rs. 22,28,639 along with future interest and costs from the defendant in an ex-parte proceeding.
Defendant liable to pay Rs. 22,28,639 with future interest and costs; Recovery Certificate issued.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE DEBTS RECOVERY TRIBUNAL-II AT HYDERABAD
DATED THIS THE 23RD DAY OF APRIL, 2026
PRESENT: SH. RAMESHWAR KOTHE, B.Com., L.LB.(HONS.), T4.A. PRESIDING OFFICER
Original Application No: 44 OF 2026
State Bank of India., Padmarao Nagar Branch, Postbag No.2 Secunderabad - 500023. Rep. by its Asst. Manager.
.....Applicant
Versus
Mrs. Aaradha na Kanagala D/o. Mr. Y. Ramanjaneya Raju Aged about 40 Years, Occ: Private Employee R/o. Flat No.102, Hemadurga Pearl, Road No.4 PJR Enclave, Chandanagar, Madhavapuri Hills Hyderabad, Telanga na - 500050.
......Defendant
Counsel for the Applicant : lvlr. AjgalRavi Babu
Defendants : Ex-pa rte
:: q-LLEL ::
OA.No.4412026
2
Whether the Applicant Bankis entitledfor the claim made in the OA againstthe Defendant?
6, As stated supra, theDefendant remainedex-parte.The Evidence Affidavit coupled with therecitals in the documentsviz.,Exs.A.1 to A.08 marked on behalf of theApplicant Bank clinchesthe claim of the Applicant Bankagainst the Defendant.Hence, I hold that the Defendant is liable topay theOA claim to the Applicant Bank with future interest and costs.
OA.No.44/2026
3
,2t <. *rr] ///-r>*oo
lnnuEsnweRxornel PRESIDINGOFFICER
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the Applicant Bank is entitled for the claim made in the OA against the Defendant?
1 provisions across 1 enactments
State Bank of India, Padmarao Nagar Branch
Sh. Rameshwar Kothe
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
