Partly allowed

Canara Bank v. Mr Balakrishna P Bhandari

DRT16 Mar 2026OA/414/2022

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The Court allowed the withdrawal of Original Application No.414 of 2022 filed by the Applicant Bank after the matter was amicably settled for Rs.1,18,40,000/- with the Defendants. The withdrawal application was consented to, and the Original Application stood disposed of.

What did the court decide?

Withdrawal of I.A. No.644 of 2026 and O.A. No.414 of 2022 allowed; return of original documents ordered.

Canara Bank versus Mr Balakrishna P Bhandari — Writ and Judicial Review | DRT (2026)

¶1

16.03.2026	Exh.	*Roznama-MDRT-II* *O.A. No.414 of 2022*	Next date
		Mr Pankaj Uttaradhi and Ms Sabeena Mahadik i/b M/s. S.R. Legal, Advocate for the Applicant. None for Defendants.
		Applicant Bank has filed Withdrawal Application I.A. No.644 of 2026 supported by affidavit for withdrawal of the O.A. No.414 of 2022. Ld. Advocate for the Applicant submits that the matter has been amicably settled with the Defendants for a sum of Rs.1,18,40,000/- and the Applicant had issued No Dues Certificate dated 17.02.2026 to the Defendants and their loan stands closed. Hence, prays for withdrawal of the present O.A. In view of the above submissions, the withdrawal of I.A. No.644 of 2026 is allowed. Resultantly, O.A. No.414 of 2022 stands disposed of as withdrawn. Heard in I.A. No.646 of 2026. Ld. Advocate for the applicant has filed I.A. No.646 of 2026 for return of the original documents. Ld. Advocate for the applicant submits that the matter is settled and the applicant bank does not wish to proceed with the O.A. and

¶2

Page 1 of 2

¶3

su - 39	wants to take the original documents and so, that it may be returned to the borrowers. In light of the statement made by the Ld. Advocate for the applicant, I.A. No.646 of 2026 is allowed. The Registry is hereby directed to return the Original Documents to the Applicant Bank after placing certified copy of the same on the record and against proper receipt and following the due procedure as per the Rules. The Applicant shall be entitled to refund of court fees as per Rules. File be consigned to the Record Room after due compliance. Sd/- P.O. DRT-II	Closed

¶4

Page 2 of 2

Canara Bank v. Mr Balakrishna P Bhandari

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Canara Bank v. Mr Balakrishna P Bhandari

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Case details

Similar cases

Mr Kaizad Dinyar Tangri versus State Bank of India

Mr Khan Mohd Fareed and Other versus Hdfc Bank

Jayesh Gada versus Asset Care and Reconstruction Enterprise Limited

Punjab National Bank versus Nazia Patel

Hdfc Bank versus M/s. Hr Integrated Media Pvt. Ltd.

Bank of Baroda versus Rakesh Babaldas Panchal