The DRT-II at Hyderabad dismissed the Bank's OA for recovery of dues. The Bank forfeited its right to adduce evidence due to non-appearance, while respondent parties forfeited their rights due to non-filing of written statement or arguments.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE DEBTS RECOVERY TRIBUNAL-II AT HYDERABAD DATED THIS THE OTTH DAY OF AUGUST, 2026
PRESENT: SH. RAMESHWAR KOTHE, B.Com., L.LB. (Hons.), M.A. PRESIDING OFFICER
Original Application No: 412 OF 2022
CANAM BanK., Madhapur Branch, Hyderabad Rep. by its Authorised Signatory.
.....Applica nt
Versus
......Defendant
Counsel for the Applicant : Dr. Shaik Faheemullah Defendants : Ex-parteAve
OA,No.412l2022
2
:: (LLLLL ::
OA.N0.4L2l2O22
(Dictated to the steno., transcribed by him, corrected, signed andpronounced by mein the open court on this the 07th day of Ausust, 2026).
(/6*"o',1[ frr_,a7 ..^5
(KAMESHWAR KOTHE) PRESIDING OFFICER
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the Applicant Bank proved its claim made in the OA against the Defendants?
CANAM BanK., Madhapur Branch, Hyderabad
M/s. Totus Health Care India Limited.
Vedprakash Vyas
Smt. lyothi Vyas
K. Durga Prasad Mushini
RAMESHWAR KOTHE
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
