Allowed

South Indian Bank Ltd. v. Smt. Kalla Rajeshwari

DRT29 Jul 2026OA/411/2026

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Debts Recovery Tribunal allowed the bank's Original Application for recovery. It declared the defendants jointly liable to pay the principal amount with future interest and costs, and confirmed the bank's right to proceed against both the mortgaged property and the defendants' assets. At the defendants were absent, the court relied on the bank's evidence affidavit and marked documents.

What did the court decide?

The defendants are liable to pay Rs.32,51,840.74 with future interest; the claim secured by mortgage; bank entitled to proceed against properties; costs allowed; Recovery Certificate directed.

South Indian Bank Ltd. versus Smt. Kalla Rajeshwari — Execution and Attachment | DRT (2026)

¶1

IN THE DEBTS RECOVERY TRIBUNAL.II AT HYDERABAD DATED THIS THE 29TH DAY OF ]ULY, 2026

¶2

PRESENT: SH. RAMESHWAR KOTHE, B.Com., L.LB. (Hons.), M.A. PRESIDING OFFICER

¶3

ORIGINAL APPLICATION No: 411 OF 2026

¶4

South india Bank Ltd., Rep by its Branch Manager 1.4r. Mithun Pachery Mohan, S/o. Mr. Pachery I4ohanan, H.No.8-3-274/ 22lS, Ground Floor Sai Surya Tower, Sreenivasa Colony(West) Ameerpet, Hyderabad - 500038. Rep. by its Authorized Signatory.

¶5

.....Applica nt.

¶6

Versus

¶7

Smt. Kalla Rajeshwari, W/o. Late Kalla Ven kata Rao, D .No.4-32-47/ 1,4O/ A Rag havend ra Naga r Colony, Allwyn Colony, Kukatpally, H yd e ra bad - 5 0007 2.

¶8

Also at:-

¶9

76-2-23/e, Dharma Reddy Nagar^phase-2 Kukatpally, Hyderabad - 500072.

¶10

SSKV Durga Rao, S/o. Late SVVNS Satyana raya na, D.No.4-32-4t/ t4O/ A Raghavendra Nagar Colony, Allwyn Colony, Kukatpally, Hyderabad-500072.

¶11

Also at:-

¶12

76-2-23/e, Dharma Reddy Nagar^phase-2 Kukatpally, Hyderabad - 500072.

¶13

. .. Defendants

¶14

Counsel for the Applicant : Ms. CH. Laxmi Chaya Defenda nts '^Ex-eafte/N$S

oA.NO.411/2026

:: qLLE-& ::

The Applicant Bank filed the present OA for the recovery a total sum of Rs.32,51,840.74ps from the defendants jointly and severally with future interest @9.55o/o p.a. with monthly rests from the date of application till the date of realization along with costs and in default for sale of OA schedule property.

¶19

Summons served on D1 and 2 through paper publication. They were set ex-parte on 27.07.2026 as called absent and no representation.

¶20

The Applicant Bank examined Mithun Pachery Mohan, Branch Manager, as AW-1 and marked 15 documents through him as Ex. A. 1 to Ex. A.15.

¶21

Heard the Ld. Counsel for the Applicant Bank. Perused the material placed on record.

¶22

The point that arises for consideration is:-

¶23

Whether the Applicant Bank is entitled for the claim made in the OA against the Defendants and OA schedule property?

¶24

As stated supra, the Defendants remained ex-parte. The Evidence Affidavit coupled with the recitals in the documents viz., Exs. A.1 to A.15 marked on behalf of the Applicant Bank clinches the claim of the Applicant Bank against the Defendants. Hence, I hold that the Defendants are^jointly and severally llable to^pay the OA claim to the Applicant BZt with future^interest and costs. (y<$'*

¶25

oA.NO.4L7l2026

¶26

. 7. In the result, the^present Original Application No.411l2026^is allowed as under: -

¶27

i) The Defendants are^jointly and severally liable to pay to the Applicant Bank a sum of Rs.32,51,840.74ps with future interest @9olo p.a. simple from the date of application till the date of realization;

¶28

ii) the OA claim is secured by way of mortgage of property described in the schedule annexed to the OA and the applicant bank^is entitled to proceed against the same to realise its debt;

¶29

iii) the applicant bank is also entitled to^proceed against the person and^propertiesof defendants for realization of its dues;

¶30

iv) the applicant bank is entitled for the costs.

¶31

B. The Applicant Bank is directed to file Cost^{Memo within2 weeks} from the date of receipt of this Order.

¶32

q Issue Recovery Certificate accordingly.

¶33

Communicate a copy of this order to the^{parties concerned.} (Dictated to the steno, corrected, signed and pronounced by me in the open^{court on} thisthe2gthDayofJuly,202s).

¶34

,*ffi#, PRESIDING OFFICER

South Indian Bank Ltd. v. Smt. Kalla Rajeshwari

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

South Indian Bank Ltd. v. Smt. Kalla Rajeshwari

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Ms St Jobs Christian Minority Educational Society versus Canara Bank

Ms Trmr Earth Movers Transport versus Unity Small Finance Bank Limited

Mr Dumpala Venkata Laxmi Narayana versus Indian Bank

Yes Bank Limited versus Karthik Namani

Canara Bank versus M/s. Unique and Nice Restaurant.

Canara Bank versus M/s. Gsr Enterprises.