Union Bank of India v. Ayurda Buildcon
Case brief
What is this about?
Lok Adalat disposed the debt recovery application as withdrawn after the defendants settled the loan account and filed a full satisfaction memo.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
BEFORE THE LOK ADALAT DEBTS RECOVERY TRIBUNAL - II HYDERABAD
AWARD DATED: 20.06.2026.
IN
ORIG INAL A PPLICATION NO:- 401 12024
Present:-
l Sri Rameshwar Kothe, Presiding Officer
Reference made by
Applicant Bank through: Shri Tarangini Pisipati, Advocate.
Defendants through: M/s.Sucharitha Law Chambers.
Between:-
Union Bank of India.,
...... Applicant
Versus
M/s. Ayurdha Buildcon & Ors.
. . .. Defendants.
ffi*l
O.A. No.401/2024
(Given under the hand and seal of the Lok - Adalat Bench on this the20th day ofJune, 2026.)
AVSSPrasad Member
Member
ffi'"x# Riameshwar Kothe Presiding Officer
Union Bank of India.
Tarangini Pisipati
Rameshwar Kothe
A V S S Prasad
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court