Dismissed

Bank of Baroda v. Vanita Kamal Thadani

DRT25 Apr 2026OA/383/2025

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The Special and National Lok Adalat of the Debts Recovery Tribunal, Aurangabad, disposed of Original Application No. 383/2025 by allowing the applicant Bank of Baroda to withdraw the matter. The defendant had paid Rs. 8,00,000/- as a settlement amount under the Bank's OTS scheme. The court also allowed the refund of court fees and return of original documents.

What did the court decide?

Settlement of Rs. 8,00,000/- received; withdrawal of Original Application allowed; refund of court fees granted; return of original documents ordered.

Bank of Baroda versus Vanita Kamal Thadani — Banking and Recovery | DRT (2026)

¶1

BEFORE THE SPECIAL AND NATIONAL LOK ADALAT ORGANISED ON 25APRIL.2026 BY THE DEBTS RECOVERY TRIBT]NAL. AURANGABAD AND DISTRICT LEGAL SERVICES ATITHORITY

¶2

OA No.383/2025^(Sr.no.12 )

¶3

OA Withdrawal

¶4

Applicant(s): Bank Of Baroda

¶5

(hereinafter refened to as bank / financial institution)

¶6

VERSUS

¶7

Defendant(s) : Vanita Kamal Thandani

¶8

(hereinafter referred to as / borrower / guarantor(s))

¶9

Details of dispute / claim: The claim of the bank is to the tune of Rs. 20,11,318/- with cost and interest.

¶10

The defendant/s has paid the dues in his / their loan account an amount of Rs. 8,00,000 /- (Rupees only) as settlement amount under OTS. Therefore, the applicant bank does not want to proceed fuither. Hence present Original Application may be withdrawn as per the Consent Terms/Pursis filed by the applicant bank which is marked as 'A'.

¶11

The request for retum of original documents as per rules is permitted. Since the matter is before the Special and National Lok-Adalat, the Court Fees be refunded to the applicant bank as per rules,

¶12

in view of the above Consent Terms filed on record /uploaded online. The defendant is Presenilabsent today.

¶13

Applic (s)
Vi"a,b-
ln^ lAt .4.R. 1{doil- J+ *
Advocate for the Applic n
."it i
/Authorised Representa
==:- .t
L')\lL(
Adv. Sanjay Nandure
Member

¶14

Special and National Lok Adalat

¶15

Defendant(s)

¶16

Advocate for the Defendant(s) /Authorised Representative Shri. nd Adwant Chairman Special and National Lok Adalat

Date : 25.04.2026

Place : Aurangabad.

ORDER/AWARI)

In view of the above consent terms which are filed online/offline in the present matter, the order is passed. The OA No 383/2025 stands disposed of accordingly.

¶21

Refund of Couft Fees is allo*'ed as per rules. Original documents be retumed as per DRT Procedure Rules.

¶22

Date : 25.04.2026

¶23

(Shri. Makarand Adwant) CHAIRMAN Special and National Lok Adalat

Receipt

4t71126,11:47^AM

Printed oni^{24 AP.il 2026.t 11:47:55}

¶28

¶29

Debts RecoverY^{Tribunals(DRTs)}

¶30

GOVERNMENT^{OF INDIA} I^{MINISTRYOFFINANCE}

¶31

DEPARTMENT^{OF FINANCIALSERVICES}

¶32

Transaction^{Reference:3755/2026}

Diary No

37 s512026

Applicant^Name

BANK OF^BARODA

VANITA KAMAL^THADANI Defendant^Name

¶38

Date of Case^Filling

¶39

24-O4-2026

¶40

This is a computer-generated^{re(eiptand doesnot requirea physi'alsignature'}

111

aboul:blank

€,1/ 4

BEFORE THE SPECIAL AND NATIONAL LOK ADALAT ORGANISED ON

¶45

THE HON'BLE DEBTS RECOVERY TRIBUNAL AURANGABAD.

¶46

ORIGINAL APPTICATION NO. 383 OF 2025

¶47

Bank of Baroda

¶48

v/s.

¶49

Vanita Kamal Thadani and others

¶50

Defendants

¶51

WITHDRAWAL PURSIS.

¶52

Details of dispute/claim: The claim of the bank is to^{the tune of} Rs.20,11,318/- with cost and interesl

¶53

The defendant/s has^paid the dues in^his /^{their loan accountan} amount of Rs.8,00,000/- [Rupees eight lakhs^onlyJ only ) as settlement amount under^OTS scheme^{on 18.03.2026. Therefore,} the applicant bank does not want to^{proceedfurther. Hence present} 0riginal application may be withdrawn^{as per the present withdrawal} pursis filed by the bank.

¶54

The request for return of original documents^{as per rules may be} permitted. Since the matter is before the Special and National^Lok-Adalat, the Court Fees may please be refunded to^{the applicant bank as per rules.}

¶55

Date:22.04.2025 Place: Aurangabad

¶56

Ap p lica nts 0, I I Authorized Representative/ Bank of Baroda.

¶57

B dA, ifrw^q.dlcr Bank^{of Baroda}

¶58

BOB/SARAUR/REC^{I 2025-26121}

¶59

Date i 17^-04-2026

¶60

To,

¶61

Adv Mrs. Rajashri^Yewale Chh Sambhajinagar, Maharashtra

¶62

Dear Sir/Madam,

¶63

Sub: With wal of DRT Suit with^O 8312025 Borrower r. VANITA AL THADA

¶64

With respect to the^{above subject,We settledtheNPALoanaccount of Mr.} VANITA KAMAL^{THADANIbyRs. 8.00 Lakhsunder Bank's OTS schemeon dated18/03/2026}

¶65

So^you are requested^{to withdrawthe DRT suitthat was fllled againstthe Mr'} VANITA KAMAL^{THADANI withON3g3l2O25from DRT,Chh Sambhajinagar}

¶66

Yours Faithful ol Sr
. Siivastava Y
Chief Manager,
ROSARB, Chh Sambhajinagar

¶67

d-fiq a+rEq-€^{dqftsqdsn€r,&{q 6Tqf-dq"d'a a a' Q-€{q' Rrs61\r{-s'z]tnc-'{'E'qfrdr+rfi+rR-v11oo1'} Stressed Asset Recovery^{Branch, n"gion"t bm""'Plot No: 8' Sector-E ClDcON-5' Town centre'chhatrapati} Sambhajinagar-431003^{Ftl/Phone 0240 2477926, tio/Email; saraur@bankolbaroda coin}

Bank of Baroda v. Vanita Kamal Thadani

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Bank of Baroda v. Vanita Kamal Thadani

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Kotak Mahindra Bank Limited versus Gurjit Kaur

Kotak Mahindra Bank Limited versus Baldev Singh

Punjab National Bank versus Sh. Baltej Singh

Bank of India versus Pradeep Sharma

Hdfc Bank Ltd. versus Harjeet Singh Gill

Icici Bank Limited versus Ganesh Petroleum , through Its Proprietor, Yogesh Ganesh Butale