Disposed
Icici Bank Limited v. Cheryl
DRTOA/365/2022
Case brief
AI extract
What is this about?
The court allowed the Applicant Bank's application to withdraw O.A. No.365 of 2022. The bank indicated the defendant was not traceable and no assets were known. The order is disposed of as withdrawn.
What did the court decide?
Withdrawal of I.A. No.2903 of 2025 allowed; O.A. No.365 of 2022 disposed of as withdrawn; refund of court fees granted.
What the court decided
AI extract
¶1
| 09.07.2026 | Exh. | Roznama-MDRT-II O.A. No.365 of 2022 |
Next date |
|---|---|---|---|
| Ms Ketki Minhas, Advocate for the Applicant. None for Defendant. |
|||
| rst - 20 | Applicant Bank has filed Withdrawal Application I.A. No.2903 of 2025 supported by affidavit (exhibit-18) for withdrawal of the O.A. No.365 of 2022. Ld. Advocate for the Applicant submits that Defendant is not traceable and Applicant is also unaware of any assets of the Defendant. In these circumstances, the Applicant Bank wants to withdraw the above O.A. Hence, seeks for withdrawal of the present O.A. In view of the above submissions, the withdrawal of I.A. No.2903 of 2025 is allowed. Resultantly, O.A. No.365 of 2022 stands disposed of as withdrawn. Pending IAs, if any, stands disposed of. The Applicant shall be entitled to refund of court fees as per Rules. File be consigned to the Record Room after due compliance. Sd/- P.O. DRT-II |
Closed |
Parties & counsel
AI extract
- applicant
Applicant Bank
- respondent
Defendant
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court