Disposed

State Bank of India v. Vijay Bhalchandra Thakare

DRT25 Apr 2026OA/356/2024

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

In a matter before the Special and National Lok Adalat, the Debts Recovery Tribunal allowed the State Bank of India to withdraw an outstanding original application after the borrowers settled the dues. The court also ordered the refund of court fees and return of documents.

What did the court decide?

Withdrawal of OA No. 356/2024 allowed; refund of court fees and return of original documents ordered.

State Bank of India versus Vijay Bhalchandra Thakare — Insolvency and Bankruptcy | DRT (2026)

¶1

I}EFORE THE SPECIAL AND NATIONAL LO K ADALAT OIIGANISED ON 25 APRIL 2026 BY THE DEBTS RECOVERY TRIBUNAL. AURANGAI}AD AND DISTRIC't LEGAL S ERVICES AUTHOITITY

¶2

OA No.35612024 ( Su rrpSr.n o@) o5

¶3

OA Withdrawal as per IA No. 109612026

¶4

Annlicant (s): State Bank Of India

¶5

(hereinafter referred to as bank / financial institution)

¶6

VERSUS

¶7

Defendant(s) : Vijay Thakare and Others (hereinafter referred to as / borrower / guarantor(s))

¶8

Dctails of disrrute / claim: The claim of the bank is to the tune of Rs. 37,44,644l- with cost and interest.

¶9

The defendanVs has paid the dues in his / their loan account and the loan accounts are closed as settled as per IA 109612026. Therefore, the applicant bank does not want to proceed further. Hence present Original Application may be withdrawn as per the as per IA No. 1096/2026 filed by the applicant bank which is marked as 'A'.

¶10

The request for retum of original documents as per rules is permitted. Since the matter is before the Special and National Lok-Adalat, the Court Fees be refunded to the applicant bank as per rules,

¶11

¶12

in view of the above IA No. 1096/2026 filed on record /uploaded online. The defendant is PresenVabsent today.

¶13

Applicant(s)

¶14

Defendant(s)

¶15

t) -- ^J/rnJ \rVY N \T. \r\ l,^, \J.

¶16

Advocate for the- Alrplicant(s) /A uthorised Represen tative

¶17

¶18

Adv. Sanjay Nandure Member

¶19

Special and National Lok Adalat

¶20

Advocate for the Defcndant(s) /Authorised lleprescntative 4, ,/ (4./ Shri. Mahrt'and Adwant Chairman Special and National Lok Adalat

Date : 25.04.2026

Place : Aurangabad.

ORDE It/AWA RI)

In view of the above IA No. 1996/2026 which are filed online/offline in the present matter, the order is passed. The oA No 356/2024 stands disposed of accordingly.

¶25

Refund of court Fees is a,owed as per rures. original documents be returned as per DRT procedure Rules.

¶26

Date : 25.0,1.2026

¶27

(Shri. M r:l tl Aduant) C AN Special and National Lok Adalat

¶28

¶29

r(9

¶30

cl,'r.n A.+.^ k.^{324+, 64 4} /-

¶31

Printed on: 24 April 2025 at^'14:12:01

¶32

Debts Recovery Tribunals (DRTs)

¶33

GOVERNMENT OF tNDtA I MtNtSTRY OF FINANCE

¶34

DEPARTMENT OF FINANCIAL SERVICES

¶35

r Transaction Review

¶36

Transaction Reference; 2404260031 329

DRT Name

aurangabad

Case Type

Reference No 702026042419758

¶42

PF lr/S Order Code 7019830786977

Diary No

tA/1096/2026

Applicant

STATE BANK OF INDIA

Defendant

Vijay Bhalchandra Thakare

Total Fee Paid

{ 250.0

Status

SUCCESS

This is a conrputer'-gererated receipt and does not require a^physical signature

¶54

g!,io /r"*,-^{k' ?744,<4 4} /-

¶55

¶56

IN THE HON'BLE DEBTS RECOVERY TRIBUNAL, AT AURANGABAD

¶57

L ,4 6

¶58

t.A. No. lo96 oF 2026

¶59

¶60

oRTGTNAL AppLICATIoN xo. 356 oF 2024

¶61

State Bank of India

¶62

( Stressed Assets Recovery Branch)

¶63

... APPLICANT

¶64

VERSUS

¶65

Viiay Bhalchandra^'fhakare and Others

¶66

... DEFENDANTS

¶67

APPLICATION ON BEHALF OF APPLICANT BANK FOR WITHDRAWAL OF O.A. AND REFUND OF COURT FEES

¶68

MAY IT PLEASE YOUR HONOUR.

¶69

ll That the Applicant Bank instituted the present Original Application (OA) for recovery of outstanding amount from the def'endants. However, during the pendency of OA the borrower has settled the loan Accounts, and the loan accounts are closed. Therefore, nothing survives in the present OA.

¶70

2l Therefore. the Applicant bank may kindly be permitted to w,ithdrarv

¶71

the OA and the court fees may kindly be refunded as per the rules.

¶72

3] HENCE, IT IS, PRAYED THAT;

¶73

A) Present IA may kindly be allowed.

¶74

B) The Hon'ble Tribunal may please be permit the Applicant Bank

¶75

to u ithdraw the present Original Application

¶76

I BEFO VILAS Atl ,-{f t@rY ol Indlr SHIVAJI VITHALRAO DAUD rr. n5.!^!lO+4 Manager and City Case Officer, SBI SARB

¶77

¶78

C) The Hon'ble Tribunal may be pleased to refund the court f'ees as per the rules.

¶79

D) The Hon'ble Tribunal may be pleased to pass such orders which are necessary in the present facts and circumstances of the case in favour of the Applicant.

¶80

FOR THIS ACT OF KINDNESS THE APPLICANT AS IN DUTY BOUND SHALL EVER PRAY FOR

¶81

DATE:X.04.2026

¶82

PLACE : Chhatrapati Sambhaj inagar

¶83

APPLICANT s
{
a;ttl
$
5F,flil
rt a.I 2r

¶84

State Bank of India, SARB, Chhatrapati Sambhajinagar Through its Manager & CCO. Shivaji S/o Vithalrao Daud

¶85

aI
'1!_AS
6ry Govt. o( lndia l
'.rO. nlo.r 16OSa SHIVAJI VITHALRAO DAUD
Manager and City Case Officer. SBI SARB

¶86

¶87

VERIFICATION

¶88

J
E t
Fo
T
x-
'it
F t

¶89

!''
4
l6-
tg
!
a
Foz

¶90

I, Shivaji S/o. Vithalrao Dafi, Age:p1jr,-years, Occu.: Service. Manager and City Case Officer SBI SARB, Address: C/o. SBI, Stressed Assets Recovery Branch (SARB), Plot No. l, Town Center, CIDCO, Chhatrapati Sambhajinagar, duly authorized by the Applicant Srate Bank of India, do hereby verii, that the contents of I.A. are true to my personal knowledge, beliefand available office record and that I have not suppressed any material facts.

¶91

Hence, verified at Chhatrapati Sambhajinagar onthis X-.04.2026.

¶92

DEPONEN

¶93

L' /-{⁾

¶94

Identiiied by: @> Dhiraj R. Jethliya, Advocate for Applicant

¶95

Shivaji S/o Vithalrao Daud Manager and City Case Olficer. State Bank of India, SARB, Chhatrapati Sambhajinagar

¶96

AFFIS.fSIJTT

¶97

lo, O---%d e.:C-cl AL,e ' d' Tq. tliio idntifrod^itY tsEFOR ME Whom He/^{She is perscnatly Ktrot"t].} .-J NOTED^& L,: 5"[L;*.*t;LAS DEWD,I KADAM rfaeate N(}tfi!'}, cf Iadia AT Sr.^No. THIS DOCU ENT^C r;,itEA-AUrfiLqfiiiABAD DIST. PAGES ,',rob):9890615E99, 9403788324 R€9. No. 15094

¶98

.. .! APR 20?6

¶99

v.D.l(ADAtu DISTRICT Reg.No.i5094 OF

¶100

i-=T;-t€ t. ._.-

¶101

¶102

SHIVAJI VITHALRAO DAUD Manager and City Case Officer, SBI SARB

State Bank of India v. Vijay Bhalchandra Thakare

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

State Bank of India v. Vijay Bhalchandra Thakare

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Kotak Mahindra Bank Limited versus Gurjit Kaur

Kotak Mahindra Bank Limited versus Baldev Singh

Punjab National Bank versus Sh. Baltej Singh

Bank of India versus Pradeep Sharma

Hdfc Bank Ltd. versus Harjeet Singh Gill

Icici Bank Limited versus Ganesh Petroleum , through Its Proprietor, Yogesh Ganesh Butale