Allowed

Bank of Baroda v. Ayyala Sudhakar

DRT22 Jun 2026OA/35/2026

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The Tribunal allowed an application filed by Bank of Baroda for recovery of dues amounting to approximately Rs. 92.77 lakhs as a term loan and overdraft. The defendant was summoned via newspaper publication but remained absent. The court held the defendant liable based on documentary evidence.

What did the court decide?

Recovery of Rs. 92,77,745.75 plus future interest and costs ordered; Recovery Certificate issued.

Bank of Baroda versus Ayyala Sudhakar — Banking and Recovery | DRT (2026)

¶1

IN THE DEBTS RECOVERY TRIBUNAL-II AT HYDERABAD

¶2

DATED THIS THE 22Nd DAY OF JUNE, 2026

¶3

PRESENT: SH. RAMESHWAR KOTHE, B.Com. L.LB. (Hons.), M.A. PRESIDING OFFICER

¶4

ORIGINAL APPLICATION No: 35 OF 2026

¶5

Bank of Baroda, Nandyal Branch, Nandyal, Nandyal District Rep by its Authorised Officer

¶6

.......Applicant

¶7

Versus

¶8

Mr. Avyala Sudhakar S/o. Sri. Ayyala Pullaiah, aged 23 yrs, Male, Occ: Business, R/o.H. No. 1 -2-372/ 4,^palukur Village, Ramalakshmi, Kottak, Allagadda, Nandyal Dist, A.P. - 518543 .......Defendant

¶9

Counsel for the Applicant : M/s. Trivikram Chitturu

¶10

Counsel for the Defendant : Ex-parte

¶11

:: ORDER::

¶12

The Applicant Bank filed the present OA for the recovery a total sum of Rs. 92,77,745.75 ps i.e., Rs. 92,58,27t.62 ps towards term loan account and Rs. 19,474.t3 ps towards overdraft facility from the sole defendant with future interest @ 10.80o/o OWv'

¶13

oA.NO.3sl2026

¶14

p.a. with monthly^{rests from the date of application till the date} of realization^{alongwith costs'}

¶15

?. Summon^{served on Sole} Defendant through^{paperpublication} 18.06.2026 as^{called absentand no}

¶16

and was set^exparteon representatlon.

¶17

Mr. V. Chandraiah,^Senior

¶18

1. The ApPlicant^{Bank examined} 1O documents^{through himas}

¶19

Manager,^{as AW-1and marked} Ex.A.1 to^Ex.A.10'

¶20

Heard Learned^{Counselfor the Applicant'} Perused the^material placed on record.

¶21

The^point that^{arises for considerationis: -}

¶22

Whether the^{Applicant Bank is entitled} for the claim^{madein the OA against} the Defendant?

¶23

As stated^{supra, the Defendant remainedex-parte' The} Evidence Affidavit^{coupled with the recitals in the documents} viz., Exs.A.1 to^{A 10 marked on behalf of the ApplicantBank} clinches the^{claim of the Applicant Bank against the Defendant'} Hence, I hold^{that the Defendant is liableto pay the OA claim to} the Applicant^{Bank with future interestand costs'}

¶24

In the result,^{the present Original ApplicationNo'35/2026is} allowed as^{under: -}

¶25

i) The Sole Defendant is liable^to PaY^{to the} Bank a Rs. 92,77,745.75^{ps willl}

¶26

Applicant lMtv"\

¶27

/t / L-..

¶28

oA.NO.35/2026

¶29

l I i

¶30

future interest @ 10.g0o/o p.a. simple from the date of application till the date of realization;

¶31

ii) the applicant bank is also entifled to proceed against the person and properties of defendant for realization of its dues;

¶32

iii) the applicant bank is entitled for the costs.

¶33

B. The Applicant Bank is directed to file Cost Memo within 2 weeks from the date of receipt of this Order.

¶34

Issue Recovery Certificate accordingly.

¶35

Communicate a copy of this order to the parties concerned. lurcrared to the steno, corrected, signed and pronounced by me in the open court on this the 22"d Day ofJune, 2026).

¶36

HWAR KOTHE) IDING OFFICER

Bank of Baroda v. Ayyala Sudhakar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Bank of Baroda v. Ayyala Sudhakar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Mr Yempalla Mahipal Reddy versus Union Bank of India

Sri Perumandla Kishan versus M S Ikf Home Finance

Kalla Rajeshwari versus South Indian Bank

Canara Bank versus M/s. Nakoda Shopping Mall.

State Bank of India versus Mr. Veluri Vamshkrishna

Union Bank of India versus M/s. Hygiene Retail India Private Ltd.